I'd rather have Mo for only 4-5m a year!!
Mo will make AT LEAST the MLE. I'm just about positive on that. And Mo isn't and never has been much of POINT guard anyway.
I'd rather have Mo for only 4-5m a year!!
Mo will make AT LEAST the MLE. I'm just about positive on that. And Mo isn't and never has been much of POINT guard anyway.
Mo wants to start.. There aren't many teams that would give him that option.... The as constituted now the Jazz can.. Plus Mo fits the style of play of Kanter and favors then of Al and Paul..
Baring a trade for a great pg I'd rather have Mo for cheap then some of the other options out there!!
You'd rather have a simply inferior and older player because they MIGHT play for cheaper? Because that's what you're saying.
This is rather pointless as the Jazz are not in a position to get Dragic without paying a price (in talent) that they shouldn't.
Unless we can get a stud PG I would rather save money for our young four, incase any of them become a stud at their position...
We're at least two years (after this year) away from that and as it stands the Jazz must find money to spend anyway.
If they trade Hayward and do not get back a legitimate piece I will be pissed. If they trade him and get a legitimate piece I will still be annoyed.
Yep better to let him walk.
Better trade Gobert now, because, you know, he could eventually walk.
I think Donovan is likely at the peak of his value, too, based on all the hype from his 37/8 performance. Could we get some 2025 and 2027 picks for both of them? I hear there's a real strong crop of 12-yr olds out there.
And then you hope to trade that player in a couple or of years because he might not stay. May as well move the franchise if that's the strategy. Rolling eyes...We might be able to trade him for the current #3 or #5 pick. Those tend to work out.