What's new
By:

Blow it up?

I’m not butt-hurt. You simply failed to recognize his talent and based your opinion on stats like a lot of armchair experts and sportswriters who never played the game. Maybe you did play but you seemed to have focused on Mitchell’s shortcomings.


Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz
 
Eenie-Meenie said:
I’m not butt-hurt. You simply failed to recognize his talent and based your opinion on stats like a lot of armchair experts and sportswriters who never played the game. Maybe you did play but you seemed to have focused on Mitchell’s shortcomings.


Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz
Click to expand...

I don't think you read what I wrote then. I've been high on Mitchell since summer league. People on here were incredibly sensitive that I brought up how historically bad he was offensively to start the season and translated that into I'm a Mitchell hater and I think his career will suck. Oh, and I said his dunk wasn't dunk of the year (it wasn't even the dunk of the week on nba.com)
What impresses me the most about Mitchell, at this point, is the way he carries himself on thr court. His demeanor and confidence demands respect and he's getting calls already as a rookie because of it. I'm not about to say he'll be a superstar already, but the better part of me tells me he has what Hayward never did - the "IT" factor.
 
Archie Moses said:
Yeah, I was so wrong saying his first 5 games were atrocious on the offensive end. Please quantify how butt-hurt you are.
Click to expand...

Hmmm, quantify....mildly-inflamed hemorrhoid on a scale of soft-as-a-baby's-butt to bursting-anal-cyst?
 
LogGrad98 said:
Hmmm, quantify....mildly-inflamed hemorrhoid on a scale of soft-as-a-baby's-butt to bursting-anal-cyst?
Click to expand...

Saying his first 5 games were bad doesn't mean I was butt-hurt. That said, his play, particularly his shooting, made it about an 8.5/10 on the butt-hurt scale.
 
str8line said:
Now that we have two superstars is it time to shed some weight and go for the championship gamble?

Favors, Burks, Hood and maybe even Rubio... gone. Accumulate picks, get some young studs/free agents. Shoot for title in 2-4 years.
Click to expand...

If Mitchell Blossoms into what we think he can be, the Jazz are an elite wing away from the title...

Freakin Hayward if he would have just stayed he'd be healthy and on his way to getting a statue and a chance at the title but instead totally dumped us for the big market blew up his ankle/leg. Hope he gets better but wish he would have just stayed that *** hole.
 
Last edited:
Jack Strop said:
Um, "blowing it up" would mean getting rid of key players to get younger. I doubt DL goes for a tank. You risk offending Rudy just as you did Hayward and he signs elsewhere just when you think you're ready to contend.

Yes, I'm all for trading Favors, Burks, Hood and JJ. But what value do those guys have? Favs maybe gets Utah a late 1st from a contender. Hood might get Utah a protected pick. Burks has little value at his price. Utah might even have to GIVE a 2nd-round pick to dump his additional year. JJ might get a second-round pick from a playoff team.

If I were DL, I'd try to package Hood and next year's pick for a very good (like fringe all-star) player at the deadline. Mitchell is ready to start at the 2. Go for a primary scoring option at the 3 or 4.
Click to expand...

Gallinari?
 
Archie Moses said:
Saying his first 5 games were bad doesn't mean I was butt-hurt. That said, his play, particularly his shooting, made it about an 8.5/10 on the butt-hurt scale.
Click to expand...
You said more than that. You said he was slow and couldn't shoot. One was blatantly untrue and the other can't be determined in 5 games.

Sent from my A0001 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top