It's a lot in the current market, but it is OK in a market with projected 80-90 million salary cap(that would be just 12-13% from our cap in years 2-4, that's acceptable even if we think that he won't be star but just a starter, hell it's acceptable even if we think he's going to be our 6th man). I wonder if they front loaded, to retain flexibility in the later years or if it is a regular type of contract with small increases every year/equally distributed. I guess it depends on when we want to make a big move of some sort. If we are content on being bad for this year and don't expect to make big noise in '15-'16, it makes sense to front load it.
For the people comparing his contract to Lance and Ariza - all those contracts were signed before the news about the new TV deal surfaced. It might have been projected, but having it for sure guarantees huge increase in salary cap and guarantees solid increase in salaries. Also - do you really want to pay the price of the crazy? By all accounts Lance destroyed the locker room in Indiana and that's why he didn't get a better contract from them, are you willing to bet whatever is the difference between Burks and Stephenson in quality and salary that he won't destroy your lockerroom too? Especially when our team is loaded with young, inexperienced players.
About Ariza - his contract started already. This year! This year we are paying Alec 4.5 million. Also Ariza is going to be in his 30s by mid-contract. Would you rather have Burks in his prime or Ariza in his 30s?