Donovan is more of a players player, he would be someone that another star would want to play with. Gobert has a larger impact individually, but Donovan seems to be a better teammate, and seems to connect with the rest of the nba better.
Independent of anything else, you can get a much better return on Donovan in the event one is moved.
Say no to this poll don’t vote.
what is worth more, Donovan's ability to get more value via a trade or his ability to attract big name free agents to Utah ?
We don’t have too much in trades assets rn. This isn’t ever going to happen but I’d keep Donovan, try to attract another star, and then sign like Steven Adams or possibly see what Myles Turner is worth.
Why the **** would we want to trade either? Idiots.
Do you think Gobert is worth the supermax?
If Rudy is traded it's because their relationship broke and the Jazz chose him. Also, the Jazz will choose Donovan for several reasons. At that point he better have patience on the winning part cause it'll take a few years to adjust back, depending on what you get in return I guess. There was an article that said "if it comes to that, Jazz will choose Donovan every day of the week".I have serious trouble picturing a scenario of trading one, keeping the other, leading us to a title
Can't really think we'd get same impact Rudy has on winning, even more on modern nba
Also doubt we'd receive a more skilled and/or less flawed player as our first scoring option if we traded away Mitchell
Maybe trade Mitchell would make more sense in terms of the roster timeline and don't wait too much to start a rebuild. If we traded Rudy, we'd most problably fail to get better, but keep trying to build around Mitchell, than struggle to put together a really strong team before he decides to go out for nothing on his ufa (or maybe at least show some compassion to be open on his decision to leave but act more in a Paul George way, and not so much in a Kawhi Leonard, Anthony Davis style)