Exactly. And what we have are two forwards who are WAY OVERPAID. RJ and MW are only beautiful in Corbin's eyes. They are serviceable players, certainly able to provide a slight boost to some teams, but there are better options around the league for lesser dollars - i.e. much easier to make contracts match. Probably the only way to lose either at the deadline is to take on a longer contract. And I highly doubt Lindsey wants to do that. He's shown the exact opposite philosophy, trying to free the Jazz of any significant long-term commitments. I'd be shocked if the Jazz made a trade.The Nba trade deadline is February 20th at 3pm Eastern time.
Early reports suggest there is an over abundance of teams trying to sell expiring contracts, and not many buyers. Could the Jazz find a match with a young player combined with an expiring?
Wait to find out.
Exactly. And what we have are two forwards who are WAY OVERPAID.
I disagree.
We have a full roster of players that should be discussed in trade talks.
I dont think anyone on our roster should be considered untouchable.
Wont be a letdown.......... February 20th is the Return Of Cyrone Torbin!
I for one shall rejoice
Co-GM's? I wasn't aware we had that. KOC isn't involved in the day-to-day anymore. This is clearly Lindsey's plan that has been set in motion. He won the fight this summer when the Jazz stopped negotiations with their vets and made the GS trade. And right when Dennis came in, he said Utah had tried to skip a few steps in their rebuilding process. The pivotal decision will be either letting Ty go or offering him a new contract. If I were a betting man, I'd say the decision has likely been made by now and Dennis will get to bring in a new guy (and I've said this before...don't be surprised if that guy is already part of the Jazz organization).Im still confused as to who is in charge at the Jazz. This Co-GM stuff is pretty stupid.
So far I like Lindsey's philosophy, but does he even get to implement what he thinks? Im not sure. KOC and Lindsey seem like two way different GM's to me.
Marvin to Charlotte makes a lot of sense. They need shooters desperately. McRoberts is a decent option at PF for them right now, does a lot of little things, but isn't the shooter that Marvin is.
Marvin and Richard for Ben Gordon, I think that would work. Would give the Bobcats two shooters.
Agree. A trade with Charlotte, Memphis or Phoenix is the easiest to accomplish in terms of salaries and also would make sense for both Utah and any of those teams. The question is, can they get a better player from someone else?
In his first official days on the job, NBA commissioner Adam Silver is holding to a stance that the league is not ready to add an expansion team in the eager and deep-pocketed Seattle market. "Seattle is a wonderful market. It would be very additive to the league to have a team there," Silver said in an interview this week with ESPN. "But we're not planning on expanding right now, so it's not a function of price.
https://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=kx4zjfx
https://www.nbadraft.net/2014mock_draft
Outstanding trades part indicates that the Bobcats are likely to lose their own pick this year (to Bulls, top 10 protected), but get the Pistons' pick if it is outside the top 8 (currently 10) and the Blazers' pick (top 12 protected and currently 26 or so). So I think I would do the above trade to get the Blazers' pick. I hate to see Marvin go, but we could bring him back as a FA.
Trade chatter:
Rick Bonnell: Don't want to make too much of this. But if Bobcats don't make a trade by the deadline, it won't be for a lack of trying. Twitter @rick_bonnell
I heard they are most interested in a back-up pf.
[/I]
how about Marvin Williams and John Lucas for Ben Gordon and some kind of pick (I know they owe the bulls a pick this year if they get in playoffs, so maybe pistons pick, or future pick)
https://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=p7umrch