The Thriller
Well-Known Member
Um. Okay. So you reject objective truth. Alrighty. But that’s not my fault, that’s yours.See this is where we disagree. Main stream media can refute all they want. The problem is most news is not news, it’s propaganda for its political cronies. Fox, CNN etc…. All have an agenda. You just don’t like what I believe to be true. The only truth is your truth and all other truths are invalid. Truth is obviously in the eye of the beholder. This is why we can’t discuss issues. We all have our own truth and we hate the truth of those who appose us. I don’t believe most people are truly looking for what is actually true…. Just the truth of their tribal right or left leaning politics. This is why some believe we are in a civil war already. It emboldens the crazies to be crazier. Leads to Jan 6 situations, riots, etc….
You didn’t need to rely on the mainstream media to learn that the lies you posted had been debunked. The National Archives literally sent out a statement refuting them. The statement was then magnified through social media and mainstream news outlets. But I guess if you reject objective truth, then the truth is whatever you want it to be? So in your head, the National Archives didn’t debunk the claim that Obama did exactly why Trump did, right? And then insinuate that I’m the reason why intelligent discussions are impossible?
So again, if you believe in what you say about truth in your post above, why claim that the inability to have a discussion with me is impossible? It seems that most people get their news from similar mainstream sources, like me. It’s you who has this outlier look on where to get news and what qualifies as truth, right? How does one have a discussion with someone who rejects that there exists objective truth?
Last edited: