Red
Well-Known Member
Lolol, glad we see eye to eye…..Yes, really.
Lolol, glad we see eye to eye…..Yes, really.
The Supreme Court took the case because the Biden administration was using the DOJ in a way that had never been used, so they wanted to provide a framework for how the government would proceed with the prosecution of Trump. That is it. The ONLY reason this ruling is a big deal is because the left-of-center media apparatus was desperate to find anything to talk about that wasn't Biden's cognitive decline. They latched on to this nothing story and spun it to absurdity. We don't now have a king. The President can't assassinate political rivals. Trump is still being prosecuted, but now the prosecution has to go through the extra step of arguing over events being official acts or non-official acts. Oh noes.
There were 6 votes, Trump appointed 3. It's embarrassing that you didn't know that but not surprising at all. Like at all.Trump doesn't become president and this ruling never happens. It happened because trump stacked the supreme court with loyalists and trump likes corruption and no other president in history has been as corrupt as trump.
Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
I have no doubt that I won't change your mind on why it happened, and I'm not going to try, but it is the total lie over what happened in the ruling that is so incredible to me.Trump doesn't become president and this ruling never happens. It happened because trump stacked the supreme court with loyalists and trump likes corruption
I have no doubt that I won't change your mind on why it happened, and I'm not going to try, but it is the total lie over what happened in the ruling that is so incredible to me.
@Red, who I consider to be a smart guy, thinks Biden now has the power to cancel elections and remain as a king but is only not doing so because of his own morals. I can point to upcoming court dates in trials where Trump is being prosecuted, but the opinion that Presidents are now immune from prosecution is everywhere.
People can read the decision for themselves. People can see the court dates for themselves. People can see election dates for themselves. It is not like this is some hidden knowledge. The only reason the narrative can persist is because people are pulling the wool over their own eyes. I can try and lift the wool only for vast swaths to quickly put the wool back in place to shield out reality. People are weird.
That is an argument that can be made in the hearing to decide such things. I think Trump's lawyers will lose that one, but either way that is light years from the narrative of Trump being so immune from prosecution that he could assassinate his rivals without consequence.Btw, trump lawyers are now arguing that trying to overturn the election by using fake electors was an official act as president and he can't be prosecuted for it.
That is an argument that can be made in the hearing to decide such things. I think Trump's lawyers will lose that one, but either way that is light years from the narrative of Trump being so immune from prosecution that he could assassinate his rivals without consequence.
No he didn't. Just stop lying.It was trumps own lawyers who said that a president should be able to assassinate a political rival and have immunity from prosecution lol.
Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
Layers say all kinds of stuff in arguments, but that isn't what came down in the decision. Trump may have wanted blanket immunity, and he may have wanted to have won the 2020 election, but here in reality neither happened. Biden became President. Trump is still being prosecuted for acts while he was in office, and we are going to have a Presidential election this year.It was trumps own lawyers who said that a president should be able to assassinate a political rival and have immunity from prosecution lol.
Trump isn't being prosecuted for anything actually. He is just out campaigning and golfing and stuff.Layers say all kinds of stuff in arguments, but that isn't what came down in the decision. Trump may have wanted blanket immunity, and he may have wanted to have won the 2020 election, but here in reality neither happened. Biden became President. Trump is still being prosecuted for acts while he was in office, and we are going to have a Presidential election this year.
Former President Trump’s legal team suggested Tuesday that even a president directing SEAL Team Six to kill a political opponent would be an action barred from prosecution given a former executive’s broad immunity to criminal prosecution.
The hypothetical was presented to Trump attorney John Sauer who answered with a “qualified yes” that a former president would be immune from prosecution on that matter or even on selling pardons.
Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
He's being prosecuted in four cases currently.Trump isn't being prosecuted for anything actually. He is just out campaigning and golfing and stuff.
NopeHe's being prosecuted in four cases currently.
![]()
Read the Trump superseding indictment text for details on new charges in the documents case
Trump now faces eight counts related to alleged attempts to obstruct the Justice Department's investigation in the case involving documents with classified markings discovered at Mar-a-Lago.www.cbsnews.com
![]()
Read the full Trump indictment charging him with 34 felony counts
The former president pleaded not guilty to all charges in a court appearance Tuesday.www.cbsnews.com
![]()
Read the Trump indictment text charging him with 4 counts related to the 2020 election and Jan. 6
Trump was indicted by a federal grand jury investigating alleged efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.www.cbsnews.com
![]()
Read the full text of the Georgia Trump indictment document to learn more about the charges and co-conspirators
The Georgia grand jury investigating former President Trump returned indictments on election fraud, racketeering and other charges.www.cbsnews.com
Being prosecuted doesn't mean 'is sitting in a courtroom'. Being prosecuted means he under indictment.
Idk. Show me the post.Weren't you just liking and laughing at post just YESTERDAY with @Rubashov and @str8line saying they wanted to put Trump up against a wall and shoot him? Literally yesterday.... Less than 24 hours ago? You guys literally just yesterday were saying it's ok to kill a political rival. Another day, more hypocrisy.
"I'm going to give you a chance to say ... if you stay by it: If the president decides that his rival is a corrupt person and he orders the military, or orders someone, to assassinate him -- is that within his official acts for which he can get immunity?" she asked during oral arguments.
"It would depend on the hypothetical," Sauer answered. "We could see that could well be an official act."
You were right about the mental gymnasticsYep, they made it immeasurably easier for Biden to do exactly that and go after his political rival for no reason at all. Let's see the mental gymnastics the right will go through to spin this one around.
If he wins he will obviously just pardon himself. And I give about even odds on him then jailing his political opponents for no reason, again issuing himself and all involved pardons. Look for the police state to ramp up pretty damn fast. Good thing I recently picked up a couple of cases of target ammo. Who knows when it may be needed if Trump were to win. The movie Civil War will be much closer to reality then.Nope
Being under indictment means being under indictment. That already happened. He is under indictment. He hasn't been prosecuted yet. That hasn't happened and isn't currently happening. Let's say trump wins the election and never goes to trial. Let's say the judges throw out the cases. That would mean he was never prosecuted.
Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
As I've said bloodthirsty. My side doesn't want one like you guys. You're borderline obsessed with it. No... We do not lust and crave and obsess and want violence like you. @str8line who's the threat? The left craves blood.The movie Civil War will be much closer to reality then.