That's why they were invented. Originally it was a lawyer and a single plaintiff and a suit that could really help that plaintiff. The lawyers saw that with a lot of work they would get a million dollar settlement for their client, and a healthy 30-50% of the million bucks. Then there was another client, same issue. The thought, we can put in double the effort and get maybe double the money although the company at this point will most likely settle for less than the million we got for the first guy. So we do the same work, get less money, but our client gets the help they desperately need faster. Wait, there's another one? Quicker settlement, same work, less money for us. Hang on, why can't we group these together. We will bump it up to 100 million, we pocket 50 million and our clients can share whatever's left. Sure none of them get any help at all, but we're ****ing rich! **** the plaintiffs, gimme that class-action!I remember this. More specifically, I remember not getting a single red penny while the lawyers made out like bandits.
Most class actions will never yield savings for consumers. I've been through a few that get diluted as the pool of those who qualify as true consumers end up getting overrun with people making a few quick bucks that don't have to send in proof to qualify. Even stuff like getting $25 has elicited checks for $4.28 once the masses take hold. Sites such as classactionrebates.com are good at informing consumers of what's out there, but way too many people apply to them when no proof is needed to get a slice of the pie.That's why they were invented. Originally it was a lawyer and a single plaintiff and a suit that could really help that plaintiff. The lawyers saw that with a lot of work they would get a million dollar settlement for their client, and a healthy 30-50% of the million bucks. Then there was another client, same issue. The thought, we can put in double the effort and get maybe double the money although the company at this point will most likely settle for less than the million we got for the first guy. So we do the same work, get less money, but our client gets the help they desperately need faster. Wait, there's another one? Quicker settlement, same work, less money for us. Hang on, why can't we group these together. We will bump it up to 100 million, we pocket 50 million and our clients can share whatever's left. Sure none of them get any help at all, but we're ****ing rich! **** the plaintiffs, gimme that class-action!
Exactly. The class-action has nothing to do with the actual plaintiffs, it is all about enriching the lawyers. Other than that there is no use for them at all.Most class actions will never yield savings for consumers. I've been through a few that get diluted as the pool of those who qualify as true consumers end up getting overrun with people making a few quick bucks that don't have to send in proof to qualify. Even stuff like getting $25 has elicited checks for $4.28 once the masses take hold. Sites such as classactionrebates.com are good at informing consumers of what's out there, but way too many people apply to them when no proof is needed to get a slice of the pie.
You were WAY off. that is more than double what we actually got.You understand the more people who sign up, the less everyone gets, right? The $125 is a max. You will likely get about $12.
But remember the bigger picture, the company was taught a valuable lesson.WOOO ****ING HOOO!
Got my dolla dolla bills!!!!!!
$5.21 big smacaroonies
Invest that wisely and in 30 years you can afford a lunch for one at McDonald's. Everyone knows that amount won't buy a lunch there right now.WOOO ****ING HOOO!
Got my dolla dolla bills!!!!!!
$5.21 big smacaroonies
Invest that wisely and in 30 years you can afford a lunch for one at McDonald's. Everyone knows that amount won't buy a lunch there right now.