What's new

espn: jazz win thanks to dubious calls on wade

I think they meant they were questionable fouls BY Wade. But it's ESPN, so you're probably right. They can't understand how a call went against the HEAT in crunch time. It's not possible that Wade committed two stupid fouls, nope. And after their post-game analysis the writer wrote an editorial suggesting the Clippers trade Griffin and the Knicks trade Lin to The Heat for they're old bench veterans.
 
They were fouls, anyone watching the game could see that. Even the Heat announcers were saying those were definitely fouls.
 
They never mentioned the mugging by Haslem on the attempted game winner. He made no effort to set a legal pick. He just plain did everything possible to try and stop Howard from guarding Lebron. Without this obviously illegal pick he never even gets a look to win the game. If he had made the shot they would never mention it either.

Oh yeah and if they did not call the fouls on Wade they would never talk about the no calls. Those were fouls.
 
They never mentioned the mugging by Haslem on the attempted game winner.
Totally agree with this, I yelled at the tv on this one, it was a blatant shove on his part. (funny thing is if you watch 'the shot' by Stockton, Malone does the exact same thing. ;) )
 
Kinda weird to see them say that in the Jazz summary, but in the Wade summary they called the fouls "inexcusable"
 
Back
Top