FalseFlagg K
Well-Known Member
Would an offer of 5 and 65 be offensive?
nah if they think he's put the work in to be more consistent and durable.
Would an offer of 5 and 65 be offensive?
Somewhere in between 4/60 and 4/80 would be the range. I think 4/70 would get it done.
Good deal? Honestly I just think it depends on if he was healthy long-term. I don't think there is a lot of middle ground on it... I think either it will be a home run for us or a regrettable contract.
I think we should make a good effort... but if he goes Nerlens on us then just pass.
You would think, but players are unreasonable... this is not a new occurrence. I think he could point to Tim Hardaway, Allen Crabbe, etc. and say I'm better than those guys... and if he has a great healthy year he could go 25+ per year. I think it will be 4/75-85 on second thought, which might be too rich for the organization given last year's production.
I think he could point to Tim Hardaway, Allen Crabbe, etc. and say I'm better than those guys....
I agree.
If he has a great healthy year, obviously all bets are off. I'd go so far as to say he'd be dumb not to test the market in that scenario. However, I'm looking at this as Utah extending him early in the season. His previous health is definitely a big factor here. If Utah is going to wait and see what kind of year he has, then this thread is kind of pointless, as the results will determine which direction Hood/the FO decides to go.
Why hasn't [MENTION=591]White Chocolate[/MENTION] mentioned this yet? I thought I only disagreed with people?
They need to see progress from him next season. He regressed last season
With Gordon Hayward gone, the Jazz face an interesting decision – should they lock up Rodney Hood now or wait and see what the market thinks next July?
Sources close to the situation said recently that Hood and his camp are very open to an extension. While Hood is expected to play a bigger role sans Hayward, there is a window over the next two months to lock Hood into a deal that might make more sense for the Jazz today than waiting until next July.
The prevailing thought is something similar to what Evan Turner got from Portland (four-years $70 million) would lock in Hood for the next four years.
The question for the Jazz is do they bite now on a player that’s missed 58 games over the past three seasons, or do they risk Hood improving on his 12.7 points per game and 37.1 percent three-point average?
There seems to be at least a willingness on Hood’s side to get an early extension done; we’ll see if the Jazz feels the same way.
being an agent would suck right now. IT is sucha huge gamble one way or the other.
IF he signs now and plays very well will he regret signing for less or does he wait and regress or the market dries up even more.