What's new

Favors Looking Thin

If anybody thinks George Hill was acquired as a stopgap option until we understood what Dante Exum is (like, Daladumb here... who later reversed his position like a mother****er and then reversed back while denying he reversed in the first place), then they're dumb af.

Hill and his agent mis-read the market. It dried -- fast and severely. He took his one generational-money contract rather than playing on a one-year deal. That was the best of his available options. I wish him well.

He probably declined his extension from the jazz because he wanted to wait for Hayward's decision and thought the Jazz FO would just handle both players in good time. That was a bad choice on multiple levels, but it probably made some sense at the time.

Hill was great for us last year as long has he wasn't battling injuries (which had no precedent and weren't career-altering in the long-run). Great player. He gave us our best shot at making a run and keeping Hayward.


...but never mind the facts of history. Let's be bitchmade like Dala****.
 
2 iconic Jazzfanz posters going it at. This is a good spectacle.

Dal shall call upon the powers of the Rally Churro, the spirit of Fat Boris, Black Jesus Burke, and Donovan "A New Hope" Mitchell to face off against NOAS, who commands a goblin army of narcissistic A**holes.

Me right now like

View attachment 5381

Dude, Boris and DM are definitely suiting up on my side.
 
If anybody thinks George Hill was acquired as a stopgap option until we understood what Dante Exum is (like, Daladumb here... who later reversed his position like a mother****er and then reversed back while denying he reversed in the first place), then they're dumb af.

Hill and his agent mis-read the market. It dried -- fast and severely. He took his one generational-money contract rather than playing on a one-year deal. That was the best of his available options. I wish him well.

He probably declined his extension from the jazz because he wanted to wait for Hayward's decision and thought the Jazz FO would just handle both players in good time. That was a bad choice on multiple levels, but it probably made some sense at the time.

Hill was great for us last year as long has he wasn't battling injuries (which had no precedent and weren't career-altering in the long-run). Great player. He gave us our best shot at making a run and keeping Hayward.


...but never mind the facts of history. Let's be bitchmade like Dala****.

Yeah he didn't chase money... he took the only decent job left. He wishes he had signed whatever we put in front of him. And dude was good in every sense of the word... I'm still a fan. His toe doe...
 
Yeah he didn't chase money... he took the only decent job left. He wishes he had signed whatever we put in front of him. And dude was good in every sense of the word... I'm still a fan. His toe doe...

I wouldn't say he chased money but he figured that more money would be available later. It is part of the reason he declined IMO. It wasn't the sole reason but it did matter.

As stated, bad choice.
 
If it is your last contract, yeah. Going to a better team makes a difference earlier in your career. Ask everybody else that's played for SacTown recently.

I think there is something to being on a rebuilding team in a town that really likes basketball.
 
Back
Top