Park Bites
Well-Known Member
Yeah I do get that, but with the #21 it's "home run" time IMO..
in this draft I dont want to swing for the fences. I think safe rotational players would be better.
Yeah I do get that, but with the #21 it's "home run" time IMO..
The reason I don't want Adetokunbo is he will take 2 years in Europe and at least a year on NBA to be productive. With Karasev though he comes to NBA and spends a year to get used.
having one less good player next year increases the chance that the Jazz are in place to add a superstar talent in '14. Win-Win.
Unless our young talent with a weak supporting cast proves to be good enough by themselves for a 7 or 8 playoff-seed (as has crossed the mind of many people, I'm sure). Then everyone will be grumbling about how we missed the opportunity to build around them with good role players. Risks all the way around.
I don't see a star talent in Karasev or a great defender and role players aren't nearly as hard to acquire.
The Jazz need a (super) star, point blank. Kunbo has a better chance to be that (I'm not proclaiming that he will be), and having one less good player next year increases the chance that the Jazz are in place to add a superstar talent in '14. Win-Win.
But I like Karasev, too. But the evidence that you need (super) stars to win a title and can continuously put yourself in that position is overwhelming.
Then again, I didn't think Klay Thompson or Stephen Curry would be as good as they are either (and on the outset, I don't see an ocean of difference as prospects between them and Karasev). But I think they are vast exceptions to the rule.
Sergey Karasev or Shane Larkin at #21 would be ideal!
Then, BPA at #14.