I would think eating Freeland's contract and 14 would be enough to get 10 from Portland.
My mom's hot.. actually. Dont hate.
Bro, hook me up
Love it.
Haha.. last time you stiffed me on the fitty.. how I know its different now?
i vehemently disagree
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBYGqSnmFnw
and i much prefer hairstons shooting stroke
Agree with PG_AB on his Rondo/schroder and Bullock/Hairston comments.
Btw.. none of the other three deserve any comparison to Rondo at this point.
As has been said.. Rondo's playing chess and erybody else is playing checkers.
Why?
Schroder@10, Gobert@14, Goodwin@39, Southerland@40
im pretty sure once the first few picks happen 3-4-5 should fall in line to consensus, but whatever goes on 6-7-8 should really shape what the jazz are gonna be looking at with 14, specifically i worry about 12 and 13 being trade up spots for Dennis whom i really do believe at least one team has in the top 10
i still dont see the fascination with taking on a bazillion rookie contracts, but the jazz could really bring the roster age very low if they were to lets say somehow land #10 and keep the other 3 picks
im thinking maybe something complex like
we keep 14
but trade #21, the 2014 and #46 for #10, #39, #40
You lost me when I read that.
I thought people would think I was too "easy".
Reggie Bullock @ReggieBullock35
Chilly nights in salt lake city!!
Adams or Gobert would be a nice pick up if we can get another pick. It would be great to have a center who is bigger than Favors on the floor, making a huge line-up.
We really need a 1, 3 and 5.
Adams or Gobert would be a nice pick up if we can get another pick. It would be great to have a center who is bigger than Favors on the floor, making a huge line-up.
We really need a 1, 3 and 5.