What's new

Following potential 2015 draftees

At the bottom, it says that he didn't study him so he didn't include him.

Which is pretty ****ing stupid. Mario is quite possibly a top 5 player in this draft, but let's leave him out completely because we didn't take the time to watch some game tape. Laughable.
 
I might consider the Hayward +12 for 4 deal.

It sounds intriguing until you realize that Porzingis putting up Hayward numbers after 5 years in the league would have him being regarded as a pretty good success. Then you take into account his enormous bust potential the fact that he is 19 AND that we've already done our waiting with Hayward (and others) and it's just about to payoff.

And it doesn't seem like a tough choice anymore




*unless Towns, Russell, or Okafor were there at #4
 
I don't buy these leaks.. like, at all.

I mean, what message does that send your current team/players? We are targeting so and so.. and that so and so plays a position we already have filled. For what purpose? Whether it's sincere or a smokescreen, it just doesn't have real benefit. I think 9/10 are simply made up.

(I was paid to say this.)
 
Which is pretty ****ing stupid. Mario is quite possibly a top 5 player in this draft, but let's leave him out completely because we didn't take the time to watch some game tape. Laughable.

Mario was also potentially a top-7 pick in last year's draft at the same time the Jazz were slated for a top-7 pick.
 
ESPN sent a mobile update saying the Jazz are willing to trade Trey Burke and 12 to move up.

That's kind of a no-brainer anyway.

Maybe Miami would do that deal, not sure.
 
If the Jazz really trade Hayward or Favors, it will be part of a bigger off-season plan that includes chasing free agents. It's not just for a rookie prospect alone.
 
ESPN sent a mobile update saying the Jazz are willing to trade Trey Burke and 12 to move up.

That's kind of a no-brainer anyway.

Maybe Miami would do that deal, not sure.

Trades I could see if we traded down, fwiw.

12 for 16 & 28.

12 for 17 & future first round pick.

12 for 18 & Terrence Jones.

Could be interesting.
 
Locke's Big Board has Hezonja completely omitted from the top 15 - 20 picks. Again, there is something about Hezonja that makes Locke just refuse to acknowledge his existence. Locke's excuse is -- "I haven't watched him."

And yet, Locke likes Rakeem Christmas in the 2nd round.

DUDE.

He stated that he hadnt watched Hezonja enough to properly rate him, so he wont.

His big board is just a fun thing for fan to look back on when Locke brings up his track record. So he doesn't want to see have his reputation of rating a player he hasnt seen enough. IS taht OK?
 
Back
Top