Under... hard.Would you go over or under on that?
Not counting times he gets scorched. Just a good noteworthy impressive defensive play.Is this just counting the good defensive plays or is it netted out against all the times his guy scorches him, or every time he can't make a switch? If that's the case I would bet he'll be in negative territory.
A player can play good defense and still show in the negative in the nba, just saying. I will say he is a willing defender regardless of his athletic deficiencies.Would you go over or under on that?
Then I'll take the under.Not counting times he gets scorched. Just a good noteworthy impressive defensive play.
He’s looked good in the preseason. Good-to-great on offense. Definitely playable on defense.Is this just counting the good defensive plays or is it netted out against all the times his guy scorches him, or every time he can't make a switch? If that's the case I would bet he'll be in negative territory.
Time will tell. But he definitely won't be the difference-maker on a championship team. I suppose I'll be happy if he can just hold his own and not be a net negative when he steps on the floor.He’s looked good in the preseason. Good-to-great on offense. Definitely playable on defense.
We also won’t be depending on him the way we did last year, which is good for everyone.
Glad Niang is on this team, for sure.
It’s hard to know who all the difference makers are on top tier teams.Time will tell. But he definitely won't be the difference-maker on a championship team. I suppose I'll be happy if he can just hold his own and not be a net negative when he steps on the floor.