To anyone who thinks I never admit when I'm wrong, mark it. I was wrong. VERY wrong. I underestimated how far this would go and how quickly it would happen. Those who said Putin was going to take Ukraine had better instinct or sources of information than I had.
I dunno… does repeating Putin’s talking pts make her an agent of Russia? I mean, she’s really attractive, hates the same people I hate, and is really attractive oh and did I mention she’s really hot. /s
www.newsweek.com
theintercept.com
I dunno… does repeating Putin’s talking pts make her an agent of Russia? I mean, she’s really attractive, hates the same people I hate, and is really attractive oh and did I mention she’s really hot. /s
I think she finds Audience with those already very cynical and distrustful of media, unbelievably naive like @babe and @Al-O-Meter, don’t really believe in any principles at all, hate Democrats, and find her very attractive. She was invited to CPAC by cynical Republicans to bash Democrats. That’s it. She’s not conservative. But she’s a useful tool. A tool for propaganda purposes.
She very much is a useful tool of the Kremlin which is tied at the hip with Republicans right now. I don’t know if she’s benefitting from this financially. The best agents are those who don’t know they’re agents. But it’s been obvious for years that she’s a useful tool. Hillary Clinton I believe was right:
Tulsi Gabbard Is a Russian Asset and Would Be a Perfect Republican Agent
Russia is set to interfere in the 2020 elections, and Republicans are happy to let it happen. Gabbard could benefit them both.
Just like how Tucker is also a Russian tool, they broadcast his show nightly to help bolster the war effort at home.
Russian TV Uses Tucker Carlson and Tulsi Gabbard to Sell Putin's War
Fox News video of Tucker Carlson and Tulsi Gabbard trashing Ukraine and the Biden administration were a mainstay of news coverage this week on Russian TV.
The sooner more Americans realize that these agents exploit cynicism and hate to divide our country and undermine western efforts to contain Russia, the better off we’ll be.
In just this past week? Or do we want to include the past five years when they supported a president who changed the party platform to provide less aid to Ukraine? Askedfor Russia to aid in his campaign? Gave internal polling to Russian intelligence? Spoke at Helsinki trashing the IC and praising Putin? Threatened NATO allies? Enabled your president to blackmail Ukraine (1st impeachment)? Or do you want just this past week?
www.ksl.com
Just last night 2 sitting congresspeople (Paul gosar) and MTG the top fundraiser in congress spoke at this:
Dave Alvord is an ***. But yeah, another great example. Who does this benefit? Certainly not Ukraine or the west.Salt Lake County councilman criticized for comments on Russian invasion
A Salt Lake County councilman was criticized Thursday after questioning why the U.S. should care about Russia's ongoing invasion of Ukraine.
www.theatlantic.com
Imagine typing this with a straight face and then pretending to ask questions in good faith
Ya, why should the US even care? I mean russian used to own ukraine back in the day. They should be able to take it back. Just like they should be able to take back alaska right? Who cares?
I think that is supporting putin. Saying who cares is exactly what putin wants from everyone. That is just like supporting him imo.
Is chanting "putin putin putin" supporting him or not?
