The Thriller
Well-Known Member
Maybe?How does that compare realistically to the French revolution and the beheadings of all the heads of state in the country, or Stalin and his death camps as precursors to the subsequent world wars, or nuclear bombs in Japan, or the complete rewriting of the government and hundreds of thousands of deaths under chairman Mao? No, our civil war counts as, at most, a correction and adjustment. It did not represent the complete overhaul of our entire political system, something that damn near every other developed nation experienced in the course of the same 250 years. Yes it was horrifying, but realistically paled in comparison to the others and represented nowhere near the same level of change overall. Maybe we are due for something more dramatic, but if we are lucky maybe we get by with something just on par with the changes made during the civil war, maybe this gets put down and corrected through further amendments. But maybe it will take a full-on upheaval to eradicate the fascists so pervasive in our society today.
I just how that we don’t have to go through a nuclear holocaust or a bloody civil war to restore a normal functioning democracy again. Although I believe peace and prosperity have lulled a lot of Americans to sleep and have led many more to focus on petty cultural disagreements, I hope we don’t need a Stalin era to remind our country how precious freedom is. How much of our current plight can be blamed on a black man entering the White House in 2009? We all saw the rise of the tea party which devolved over the years into maga start because these folks lost their minds over a black man rising to the top of political power. Can we seriously just not accept that black people can succeed, women are equal, and gay people exist? Or do we need a few decades of totalitarian hell to understand that squabbling over the racial, gender, and sexual hierarchy is stupid?