What's new
By:

I'm writing a research paper on the 1996-97 season for the Jazz

I'm surprised they still have you writing essays in high school. I would think they'd be replaced by making memes by now.
 
I remember the days of spelling out numbers as long as possible to artificially elongate a paper. I mean, how could one-thousand, two-hundred and twenty-one possibly be more readable? (Note: put in the Oxford comma to give yourself one extra character.)

And here's a quote on essays that everyone needs to know.

Essays are like skirts; they should be long enough to cover everything, but short enough to keep things interesting.
Click to expand...
 
though unfinished yet, I was expecting more about the games and what transpired during the year most specially the "shot"; and I think 1997 wasn't the end of the era?
 
Darkwing Duck said:
I remember the days of spelling out numbers as long as possible to artificially elongate a paper. I mean, how could one-thousand, two-hundred and twenty-one possibly be more readable? (Note: put in the Oxford comma to give yourself one extra character.)

And here's a quote on essays that everyone needs to know.
Click to expand...

unfortunately my teacher is really really dumb about this. Only way we can write numbers is if it's a direct quote, other than that, we need to write EVERYTHING out. I couldn't care less if I lost a line or two and didn't have to spell out the goddamn number
 
jaytulao said:
though unfinished yet, I was expecting more about the games and what transpired during the year most specially the "shot"; and I think 1997 wasn't the end of the era?
Click to expand...

I've only finished the introduction paragraphs to everything, really. Haven't gone into any playing time and such. As for the "end of an era" section, that comes after "the sequel" which is supposed to cover a minimal summary of the 1998-99 season, and then the playoffs, and more specifically, the finals rematch and Mike's shot. End of an Era is supposed to cover the 1999-2005ish seasons.
 
Rgiss said:
unfortunately my teacher is really really dumb about this. Only way we can write numbers is if it's a direct quote, other than that, we need to write EVERYTHING out. I couldn't care less if I lost a line or two and didn't have to spell out the goddamn number
Click to expand...

Ask your teacher why APA or MLA isn't being followed.

https://www.academiccoachingandwrit...a-style-in-academic-writing-words-or-numerals

https://penandthepad.com/write-out-numbers-mla-format-1079.html

The point of a paper, especially in the academic sense, which is what pretty much all school papers are, is to be concise and easy to read. Spelling out everything before 100 does not break that flow, or in MLA's case, anything that can be written in two words. Spelling out something in the thousands makes it harder to read.

If I were to make a guess, your teacher wants the student to break out of the likely habit in message board speak of using numerals for every number even when the call might be for a written out word, so has you do everything.

At my age, I'd be raising quite a bit of hell at my teacher for requiring this. In high school, I'd just go with what's assigned to me.
 
Darkwing Duck said:
Ask your teacher why APA or MLA isn't being followed.

https://www.academiccoachingandwrit...a-style-in-academic-writing-words-or-numerals

https://penandthepad.com/write-out-numbers-mla-format-1079.html

The point of a paper, especially in the academic sense, which is what pretty much all school papers are, is to be concise and easy to read. Spelling out everything before 100 does not break that flow, or in MLA's case, anything that can be written in two words. Spelling out something in the thousands makes it harder to read.

If I were to make a guess, your teacher wants the student to break out of the likely habit in message board speak of using numerals for every number even when the call might be for a written out word, so has you do everything.

At my age, I'd be raising quite a bit of hell at my teacher for requiring this. In high school, I'd just go with what's assigned to me.
Click to expand...

Please don't be that kid.
 
Had an argument with my kid's junior high teacher. She had given a number of bad scores to students, including my daughter,on a paper citing plagiarism because all pieces of historical information must be cited. I pointed out using several scholarly references that any piece of information that would be included in an encyclopedia is considered "general knowledge" for high school work and doesn't need to be cited. Once the kid has appropriate coursework in college the rules are different. I took two semesters of such coursework (just proper citing technique) and it was rigorous. Obviously to expect 8th graders to hold to that standard was ridiculous. I gave her 4 different standard educational rubrics pointing this out.

She flipped out citing her "Years of education" and that "she knows what the rules are!" I just asked her to read the papers I gave her and reconsider.

Two days later she sent home a letter to all students outlining the new policy for citing work, exactly as I had laid it out to her. I never said another word about it, but my wife sent her cookies. All fences have been mended and she enjoyed the rest of the year with my daughter and is currently a good teacher for my son.

I then had to explain to my daughter what the hell an "encyclopedia" was.
 
framer said:
Had an argument with my kid's junior high teacher. She had given a number of bad scores to students, including my daughter,on a paper citing plagiarism because all pieces of historical information must be cited. I pointed out using several scholarly references that any piece of information that would be included in an encyclopedia is considered "general knowledge" for high school work and doesn't need to be cited. Once the kid has appropriate coursework in college the rules are different. I took two semesters of such coursework (just proper citing technique) and it was rigorous. Obviously to expect 8th graders to hold to that standard was ridiculous. I gave her 4 different standard educational rubrics pointing this out.

She flipped out citing her "Years of education" and that "she knows what the rules are!" I just asked her to read the papers I gave her and reconsider.

Two days later she sent home a letter to all students outlining the new policy for citing work, exactly as I had laid it out to her. I never said another word about it, but my wife sent her cookies. All fences have been mended and she enjoyed the rest of the year with my daughter and is currently a good teacher for my son.

I then had to explain to my daughter what the hell an "encyclopedia" was.
Click to expand...

Hasn't citing changed dramatically over the last decade with advent of the internet as both a useful and terrible tool for research? I'd certainly have to look up proper citing techniques should I ever have to write a paper again.
 
framer said:
Had an argument with my kid's junior high teacher. She had given a number of bad scores to students, including my daughter,on a paper citing plagiarism because all pieces of historical information must be cited. I pointed out using several scholarly references that any piece of information that would be included in an encyclopedia is considered "general knowledge" for high school work and doesn't need to be cited. Once the kid has appropriate coursework in college the rules are different. I took two semesters of such coursework (just proper citing technique) and it was rigorous. Obviously to expect 8th graders to hold to that standard was ridiculous. I gave her 4 different standard educational rubrics pointing this out.

She flipped out citing her "Years of education" and that "she knows what the rules are!" I just asked her to read the papers I gave her and reconsider.

Two days later she sent home a letter to all students outlining the new policy for citing work, exactly as I had laid it out to her. I never said another word about it, but my wife sent her cookies. All fences have been mended and she enjoyed the rest of the year with my daughter and is currently a good teacher for my son.

I then had to explain to my daughter what the hell an "encyclopedia" was.
Click to expand...
What did you tell her - it's Wiki for old dudes?
 
Darkwing Duck said:
Hasn't citing changed dramatically over the last decade with advent of the internet as both a useful and terrible tool for research? I'd certainly have to look up proper citing techniques should I ever have to write a paper again.
Click to expand...

Nah, there are websites that will build your MLA citations for you now. With some of them, all you need to do is give them a URL. . .
 
Darkwing Duck said:
Ask your teacher why APA or MLA isn't being followed.

https://www.academiccoachingandwrit...a-style-in-academic-writing-words-or-numerals

https://penandthepad.com/write-out-numbers-mla-format-1079.html

The point of a paper, especially in the academic sense, which is what pretty much all school papers are, is to be concise and easy to read. Spelling out everything before 100 does not break that flow, or in MLA's case, anything that can be written in two words. Spelling out something in the thousands makes it harder to read.

If I were to make a guess, your teacher wants the student to break out of the likely habit in message board speak of using numerals for every number even when the call might be for a written out word, so has you do everything.

At my age, I'd be raising quite a bit of hell at my teacher for requiring this. In high school, I'd just go with what's assigned to me.
Click to expand...

yeah I honestly don't give a damn lol
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top