♪alt13
Well-Known Member
Having the 2 dictators would have maintained control of the region.
Without the pissed off Sunnis in western Iraq, this whole ISIS/ISIL thing and Syrian Civil War never happens.
NO
ISIS did not destabilize Syria. They stepped into a vacuum. You have confused cause and effect. ISIS is the effect of Syrian destabilization not the cause of it. The cause was a crackdown by Assad following "Arab Spring" protests.
You do not need to advocate for Saddam to be against the invasion. I do believe that we should not have invaded but I do not feel the need to advocate for Saddam to justify that position. Just listen to yourself. You are advocating for a mass murdering dictator. There is no need to. There are plenty of things to base your criticism on without stooping to such a low thing.
I personally do not think that Saddam could have held on to power. The evidence is in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Syria. Each of those countries has taken it's own path since the Arab Spring. Each has different demographics and education levels that influence the outcome. By far the worst situation is in Syria. The one country that a Baathist had firm control over. Saddam would not have made things better.