I wouldn't compare a political cartoonist to a police officer, soldier or fire fighter as those are noble needed professions. But yes, I'm sure their families miss them very much.
Satire is also a noble profession.
I wouldn't compare a political cartoonist to a police officer, soldier or fire fighter as those are noble needed professions. But yes, I'm sure their families miss them very much.
It's not that they were killed. It is that they stood for what they believed in and refused to be cowed by intimidation.
Tragic no matter how you look at it. No winners here.
Satire is also a noble profession.
Is that satire? Because if so that's pretty funny.
Whatever it takes to write good satire, I don't have it. That was not satire.
Satire is the leverage of the powerless to create change. Well-done satire reverberates for centuries (Swift) and can even become standard textbook material (Twain). It's the socially acceptable way to puncture the augustness and reverence given to institutions, be they of the government, the majority religion, or the corporate world. It uses humor, or horror, to replace angry diatribes. It enlightens by inviting the reader in.
Of course, satire can be and usually is poorly done (see Sturgeon's Law), and I have no opinion on how good the satire of Charlie Hebdo has been. Satire always falls flat when directed at the ideas of the disenfranchised. If Charlie Hebdo has been directing it's derision at the Muslim citizens of France, it's probably been poor satire. However, just as having a dirty police officer, or even a racist police culture, does not demean the calling of police work generally, poorly done satire does not demean satire generally.
Satire is also a noble profession.
Like when lucy would pull the football away right as Charlie Brown was about to kick it?Whatever it takes to write good satire, I don't have it. That was not satire.
Satire is the leverage of the powerless to create change. Well-done satire reverberates for centuries (Swift) and can even become standard textbook material (Twain). It's the socially acceptable way to puncture the augustness and reverence given to institutions, be they of the government, the majority religion, or the corporate world. It uses humor, or horror, to replace angry diatribes. It enlightens by inviting the reader in.
Of course, satire can be and usually is poorly done (see Sturgeon's Law), and I have no opinion on how good the satire of Charlie Hebdo has been. Satire always falls flat when directed at the ideas of the disenfranchised. If Charlie Hebdo has been directing it's derision at the Muslim citizens of France, it's probably been poor satire. However, just as having a dirty police officer, or even a racist police culture, does not demean the calling of police work generally, poorly done satire does not demean satire generally.
Like when lucy would pull the football away right as Charlie Brown was about to kick it?
Like when lucy would pull the football away right as Charlie Brown was about to kick it?
Shady bitchesWhat do you interpret that as a satire of?