jom2003
Well-Known Member
It's kind of crazy that our starting lineup only played 12 minutes together.
cuz anything that involved niang or royce tonight was nothing but abomination
It's kind of crazy that our starting lineup only played 12 minutes together.
I know we can't get a better player. He's amazing. But we could get 2 or 3 really good guys who aren't 6'1at present DM is already our best player. you can't get a better player than him in a trade, especially as he's still on a rookie contract.
given our current lack of assets, the best bet is josh jackson. two-way wing don't grow on trees and we have to take a gamble at this point.Mitchell is going to be here for a long time. Gobert probably too. Bogdanovic is a solid floor spacer. Now add to that a solid 2-way wing and you have a team that wins close to 60 games per year.
If there's a problem right now with our backcourt, it's that Conley takes the ball out of Mitchell's hands, and Conley doesn't put the same pressure on the defense.
just how exactly can we match "2 or 3 players" to DM's current 3.6 mil in salary?I know we can't get a better player. He's amazing. But we could get 2 or 3 really good guys who aren't 6'1
Which is why I said "+ Filler."just how exactly can we match "2 or 3 players" to DM's current 3.6 mil in salary?
cuz anything that involved niang or royce tonight was nothing but abomination
and? what type of "filler" are you suggesting that bring you "2-3 good players"?Which is why I said "+ Filler."
given our current lack of assets, the best bet is josh jackson. two-way wing don't grow on trees and we have to take a gamble at this point.
FO needs to pull the trigger.
not gonna happen. we don't have the assets unless you are willing to move clarkson, then it defeats the purpose.What we need is a prime version of Trevor Ariza.
I was thinking maybe Niang, Alema, and you if you're up for it.and? what type of "filler" are you suggesting that bring you "2-3 good players"?