homeytennis
Well-Known Member
They didn't say how many games they would try to win,Yes, here is a passage that sums it all up:
They didn't say how many games they would try to win,Yes, here is a passage that sums it all up:
that's not nepotism... that's homietismTJ’s article echoes what we’ve all been saying. You have to pick a direction. It just so happens to be the case that one of the directions is a horrific option. The nepotism we have to worry about is not DA and AA, it’s Ryan hiring his buddy to do potentially stupid things.
I can choose to believe we’re not actually this stupid.
Anyway, I think the nepotism angle here is a real red herring. Imagine if it was announced that we hired some random guy from a front office who hadn't been a GM yet and all of the sudden he was supposed to be our decision maker. Would we not be asking WTF is going on? But now instead we're arguing whether AA is or isn't qualified for this position. The former situation would be a huge shock having us all wonder what any of this means but now it's swallowed up in the squirrel of "it's Ainge's son." Perhaps he's good. I have no idea. I've always argued that Ainge appears to be operating in a fashion where something falls out of the sky and works for your good, which may happen in Boston but doesn't happen here. I doubt the younger Ainge has that type of experiential bias to believe that, so for all we know this is a good thing. But bigger than this, we just took a team that's the closest we've been to a title in almost 30 years and cashed it in on Ainge-centered plans. If we needed to go in a different (assuming it is different) AA direction, then that time was two years ago. Not now.
But yes, KqWIN has a bit of a point about buddies, at least the way I interpret it. Ryan's connection to Ainge kind of reminds me of The Dude and Walter, where Walter gets him all riled up about a fake kidnapping and then screws everything up, but at the end doesn't have any skin in the game so tells the Dude to not worry about it when it burns to hell.
Spoiler for swears:
I don't know. This seems like we're distracted from the reality of what's happened to this franchise under Ryan's tenure. And all these players have no long-term skin in the game, so they'll all be able to walk away like Walter and tell us not to worry about it.
My thoughts exactly.I have so many mean things to say about Austin Ainge’s face but will hold onto them until he starts doing stuff.
Also could be Ryan not knowing we still owe a top 8 protected pick to OKC. Call it the DL legacy.There is a chance Ryan actually hired him because he wants to win. I dont know how last year impacted the business side and **** like that can really trump the value of a single draft pick in the eyes of the owner.
I heard this statement several times, but is it true. If we look at the actual playoff record the Deron-Boozer Jazz had three deep playoff runs ( advanced to the second round two times, and went to the Conference Finals once), while the Mitchell-Gobert Jazz had just two deep runs (both ended in the second round). I think it is pretty fair to say that the Deron-Boozer Jazz achieved more.But bigger than this, we just took a team that's the closest we've been to a title in almost 30 years and cashed it in on Ainge-centered plans.
All the speculation here is good and all, but it's probably worth listening to AA himself explain his answer to the press conference tanking question (start at about 4:30 mark):
All the speculation here is good and all, but it's probably worth listening to AA himself explain his answer to the press conference tanking question (start at about 4:30 mark):
Did they even specifically make it a plural?They didn't say how many games they would try to win,
All the speculation here is good and all, but it's probably worth listening to AA himself explain his answer to the press conference tanking question (start at about 4:30 mark):
The "customer" reaction to the last few years is getting progressively worse and it has to be obvious to Ryan that he has lost a lot of viewership - particularly now that banking on luck didnt work. I will be very surprised if we sit our best players or pull them in the 4th during close games going forward. The real question is whether we trade our best players. Either way I think going forward we try and win games with whatever talent level we have. A welcome change in my opinion and one that will re-engage many fans.After listening to this interview, I wonder if Ryan told Austin (maybe when he called him about hiring him) that he wouldn’t want us to tank another season the same way we did this season (via lineup manipulation, sitting players, etc.), and Austin then said he'd do what Ryan wanted. But this could be a problem for the Jazz if they’re tanking again next season, because other tanking teams will be using every possible tanking trick. Idk, maybe Austin has already decided that he’ll move (or try to move) Collins, Sexton, and Clarkson (and possibly even Lauri) if the Jazz want to tank for the loaded 2026 draft.
It's also ****ing unbelievable.The "customer" reaction to the last few years is getting progressively worse and it has to be obvious to Ryan that he has lost a lot of viewership - particularly now that banking on luck didnt work. I will be very surprised if we sit our best players or pull them in the 4th during close games going forward. The real question is whether we trade our best players. Either way I think going forward we try and win games with whatever talent level we have. A welcome change in my opinion and one that will re-engage many fans.