What's new
By:

Kamala Harris for Pres

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 365
  • Start date Start date
default said:
She has literally done next to nothing in the VP roll for her 3.5 years. She was assigned to address the border. She didn't even go there to see it first-hand or to meet anyone on the front lines for well over a year. It's not that she is doing everything bad, she just does nothing at all. There are so many better democrats for the roll of president than her. Even with the current extreme travel issues our nation is experiencing with air travel, I would still think Pete Buttigieg would be a much better candidate. Joe Manchin would be substantially better. Take your pick of Governors Whitmore, Shapiro, or even Moore would be better options. There are decent options, we don't have to settle on Harris.
Click to expand...

Joe Manchin can suck my ****. Coal-owned SOB needs to go away.

Pete, Whitmore, Shapiro and Moore are 99% aligned in terms of policy with Kamala. She already being on the ticket, like in terms of logistics, just takes a lot of risk out of the process of setting up the new candidate. Veeps don't really do much no. It's like being a backup QB. Watch and learn. DA, AG and Senator for California is solid experience all on its own.

Borders and Immigration is its own can of worms and probably has its own thread somewhere if that needs to be re-litigated. TLDR: republicans don't actually care about solving illegal immigration, they'd lose their best ongoing talking point if that were the case.

Kamala is mostly inoffensive and very lame, who gives af when the thing that actually affects us are the policy propositions and if they can get them passed through or not.

Something I will say is that she really needs to avoid pulling a Hilary and act entitled to the presidency. She needs to show passion and recognize that votes need to be earned.


P.S. It's "Role" not "Roll"
 
Last edited:
Safetydan said:
Joe Manchin can suck my ****. Coal-owned SOB needs to go away.

Pete, Whitmore, Shapiro and Moore are 99% aligned in terms of policy and Kamala already being on the ticket, like in terms of logistics, just takes a lot of risk out of the process of setting up the new candidate. Veeps don't really do much no. It's like being a backup QB. Watch and learn. DA, AG and Senator for California is solid experience all on its own.

Borders and Immigration is its own can of worms and probably has its own thread somewhere if that needs to be re-litigated. TLDR: republicans don't actually care about solving illegal immigration, they'd lose their best ongoing talking point if that were the case.

Kamala is mostly inoffensive and very lame, who gives af when the thing that actually affects us are the policy propositions and if they can get them passed through or not.

Something I will say is that she really needs to avoid pulling a Hilary and act entitled to the presidency. She needs to show passion and recognize that votes need to be earned.
Click to expand...
Forreal, **** Joe Manchin. He's a ****ing DINO and I'm not talking about his age.

He singlehandedly (okay he had accomplices) torpedoed good legislation from the Biden admin.
 
NUMBERICA said:
I really make it a point to stay away from this argument, but only a (brown) woman can be a District Attorney, United States Senator, Vice President, and also not have earned sufficient merit to run for President.

More importantly, there are legal questions about how you switch horses this late in the game that Kamala is best positioned to answer. It would also be unwise to open up a primary with two months before ballots go out.
Click to expand...

I agree that opening up a primary has its risk but I think there is enough time. There are deep reservations about Kamala obviously. No way Pelosi and Schumer would have held out their endorsement if there weren't. But she definitely merits running, as do everyone being mentioned. But is she likable enough? It's a popularity contest and I worry she won't be popular. I could be wrong and hopefully I am. It looks like she's the choice and that's that, so I'm about to change my tune and look for the good in her.
 
Last edited:
default said:
There is no way I could vote for Harris. She wouldn't even be in my top 10 Dems. She is completely useless and was only made VP for reasons beyond her skillset..
Click to expand...

I agree she was made VP for reasons beyond her skillset. But that doesn't really disqualify her at all. If the choice is between The Rapist or her she might as well be Abe Lincoln.
 
str8line said:
I agree that opening up a primary has its risk but I think there is enough time. There are deep reservations about Kamala obviously. No way Pelosi and Schumer would have held out their endorsement if there weren't. But she definitely merits running, as do everyone being mentioned. But is she likable enough? It's a popularity contest and I worry she won't be popular. I could be wrong and hopefully I am. It looks like she's the choice and that's that, so I'm about to change my tune and look for the good in her.
Click to expand...
Yeah, this is over. It just is. Don’t look a gift horse in the mouth and focus on the differences between her and the Democrats vs Trump and his cult.
 
Safetydan said:
Joe Manchin can suck my ****. Coal-owned SOB needs to go away.

Pete, Whitmore, Shapiro and Moore are 99% aligned in terms of policy with Kamala. She already being on the ticket, like in terms of logistics, just takes a lot of risk out of the process of setting up the new candidate. Veeps don't really do much no. It's like being a backup QB. Watch and learn. DA, AG and Senator for California is solid experience all on its own.

Borders and Immigration is its own can of worms and probably has its own thread somewhere if that needs to be re-litigated. TLDR: republicans don't actually care about solving illegal immigration, they'd lose their best ongoing talking point if that were the case.

Kamala is mostly inoffensive and very lame, who gives af when the thing that actually affects us are the policy propositions and if they can get them passed through or not.

Something I will say is that she really needs to avoid pulling a Hilary and act entitled to the presidency. She needs to show passion and recognize that votes need to be earned.


P.S. It's "Role" not "Roll"
Click to expand...
Just wanted to underscore that Republicans killed an immigration bill that they mostly authored because it would take away their talking point. Plain as day. In the open.
 
Safetydan said:
Cutting it will save you some labor overall I think, and it's still super good. When I eat Kimchi, I prefer Pogi style or the whole head. You could compromise with half the head or a quarters of it (cut lengthwise).
Click to expand...
With whole head I worry about being able to fully clean it without destroying it. I also worry about how it would fit into my fermentation vessel. There can't be air gaps. Here's is what my fermentation vessel looks like.

shopping


I think it holds about 2.5 gallons.
 
Sardines said:
With whole head I worry about being able to fully clean it without destroying it. I also worry about how it would fit into my fermentation vessel. There can't be air gaps. Here's is what my fermentation vessel looks like.

shopping


I think it holds about 2.5 gallons.
Click to expand...
Can you fit them if you cut the whole head into halves or quarters? Not that you have to. chop it the **** up if you want.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top