The Fresh Prince
Well-Known Member
They weren't pulling back on the punches in this one.
29 years old, and out of the league.
While acknowledging that I don't know the accuracy of the substance of what Freedom said, systemic human suffering is everyone's business.Some things that aren’t your business should stay that way. He got what he asked for.
Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz mobile app
Why are you so concerned with how conservatives respond?There absolutely should be a reckoning for China. The way they handled Covid initially and the way they've continued to commit genocide should have led to big time consequences. Seems to me like a good world response would've been boycotting the Winter Olympics or the IOC not giving them the Olympics in the first place. I did my part, I didn't watch them. I try and buy American when I can, but most of the stuff I buy is made in China and there's no alternative. I wish American companies cared more about human rights and social justice. But I also heard that conservatives didn't like it when businesses stood up for those things? Now they do?
But I thought conservatives didn't like boycotts? Now they do? It's hard to keep track of what is an appropriate response to a business or country that I disagree with!
Because consistency is important to me. I hope they’re truly concerned with injustice instead of expressing bigotry (i. e. “All Lives Matter”, “Blue Lives Matter”, and “Wuhan Flu” and “China Virus”). If they’re truly committed, I’d love to see them engage in rectifying the social injustices here along with the horrible social injustices in China. Imagine the difference conservatives could’ve made in the summer of 2020 if they had given racial justice half as much support as they’ve given anti vax truckers!Why are you so concerned with how conservatives respond?
Some things that aren’t your business should stay that way. He got what he asked for.
Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz mobile app
There is no traditional freedom to spread disease.Anti-vax truckers? That's a bit narrow minded, they're fighting to remain free.
This is a lie. The covid19 vaccine was a vaccine under the old definition.Did you know the CDC changed the definition of vaccine ...
This is true.But since this thread is about Enes Freedom, he gave up a lot to say something. He'll never play again, can't go home, has lost many friends, and on many points he's right.
Actually, I don't lie. Quite frankly I wish I was, my entire immediate family is vaxed, some of my friends and acquaintances as well. Only one death, but my circle is pretty small, and I could give you a list of problems just among the people I know but it's a bit exhaustive. But back to not changing the definition: definition went from "a product that stimulates a person's immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease" to "a preparation that is used to stimulate the body's immune response against diseases." IMO, those are quite different.There is no traditional freedom to spread disease.
This is a lie. The covid19 vaccine was a vaccine under the old definition.
I deleted the rest of your lies. There was little left.
This is true.
I didn't say it was your lie. I'm quite content to accept your just some dupe spreading lies created by other people. The statement itself is still a lie.Actually, I don't lie.
We all have problems, but they are not caused by the covid19 vaccine.... and I could give you a list of problems ...
They are at best mildly different, and as I pointed out, the covid19 vaccine would still be a vaccine under the first definition.But back to not changing the definition: definition went from "a product that stimulates a person's immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease" to "a preparation that is used to stimulate the body's immune response against diseases." IMO, those are quite different.
Well, actually, concentrate on the part about "protecting the person from that disease". The shot protects nobody from anything, the CDC admits it, Albert Bourla (Pfizer CEO) admits it, Fauci admits it, the facts show it, at this point, I didn't know people were still under this illusion. The shot actually guarantees you will get it and every other virus that comes along. Early on, it was estimated by many doctors that the first shot would reduce natural immune function to 85% of normal, the second would reduce it to 60% of normal and so on. Try doing a small amount of research for every country that has vaccinated large portions of their populations and notice the trends in cases, hospitalizations, deaths.They are at best mildly different, and as I pointed out, the covid19 vaccine would still be a vaccine under the first definition.
Jesus, you seem like a gem. Please expound. Can’t wait to hear the rationale on this beaut of a post.
This has been pointed out to you already and you've ignored it. You are NOT interested in having a discussion with any of us unless you think we're falling for your nonsense.Well, actually, concentrate on the part about "protecting the person from that disease". The shot protects nobody from anything, the CDC admits it, Albert Bourla (Pfizer CEO) admits it, Fauci admits it, the facts show it, at this point, I didn't know people were still under this illusion. The shot actually guarantees you will get it and every other virus that comes along. Early on, it was estimated by many doctors that the first shot would reduce natural immune function to 85% of normal, the second would reduce it to 60% of normal and so on. Try doing a small amount of research for every country that has vaccinated large portions of their populations and notice the trends in cases, hospitalizations, deaths.
You may have noticed an uptick in commercials normalizing heart attacks, AIDS, and neurological issues. Have you seen the list of athletes dead in the last six months from heart attacks? 110 in FIFA alone. Maybe you've seen the Insurance companies claiming a 40% uptick in deaths in people aged 18-49 when a 10% increase would be considered a statistical outlier? Insurance payouts at 265%. In some countries (Australia for sure), refusal to pay, deaths considered suicide because "no one forced you to take it", that will come to America as well. The vaccine wasn't created for Covid, Covid was released for the injections (digital identity, big thing to the WEF). Why do you think they completely shut down known viral remedies? (Zinc ionophores, Vit D, Ivermectin (Nobel prize winner), hydrochloroquine, etc.) To get access to emergency authorization use, there has to be no other alternative. The entire "pandemic" was constructed on the PCR test which cannot differentiate between viruses, virulence, etc and was run at a cycle number which greatly exaggerated positives. The inventor, Kary Mullis, was even warning to not use it for this purpose, and coincidentally died. Anyway, I'll stop, because there's a better time and place to discuss. You're welcome to message me privately.
Already replied. You seem quite the gem yourself. Please attempt to troll elsewhere
Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz mobile app
That’s a response? Lmao. Okay. Go bury your head back into the sand, dimwit.