yes, but banks also use it.
Right. But it's all about context, no?
yes, but banks also use it.
...and it ended up on page 111. Well, isn't that spiffy?!
Right. But it's all about context, no?
...and it ended up on page 111. Well, isn't that spiffy?!
Being an addicted, and I must say convicted, philosopher, context is the relevant reality in life.
So if you were convicted, wouldn't all you said be excontext?
I see what you're driving at. . . . in that case, however, I think the term "ex-" would be presumptious and false, perhaps in some way like saying someone is an "ex-con" is. Presuming me to be out on the lam, and the context somehow different. , , , ,
however, the logic fails to line up perfectly, as ex-cons will always be cons, no ex to it.
It's a perpetual problem that drives me to seek refuge in meaninglessness.
I do find, however, joy in this thread.
At least we get a new page quicker than we get a new day.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Edwsf-8F3sI