What's new

Longest Thread Ever

Wrong. Getting along is fun.

you need a gentle reminder of how the male brain is different. . . . .

Remember those pics in your Hillary thread????

"Getting Along" with Hillary is definitely "No Fun".

On the other hand, sometimes "Getting Along" can be plenty of fun.

I'll look up some pics to help this idea along. . . .
 
you need a gentle reminder of how the male brain is different. . . . .

On the other hand, sometimes "Getting Along" can be plenty of fun.

I'll look up some pics to help this idea along. . . .

surprised-baby.jpg
 

I was thinking more like Gail Russel, for example. . .

well, say about 1949, maybe. . .. not 1960.

so the word on the street is, she was lesbian. . . . had a whole pack of personal demons, wrecked her car in a drive-in, drunk. . . . died at 36 in a pile of bottles. This is unbelievably depressing, somehow. . . .

In The Great Dan Patch she was the girl who understood. . . . .

I guess I forgot how to do pics. . . where's PKM?



what happened to all the free pics, anyway?
 

Attachments

  • gail_russell_1957_0705a_2.jpg
    gail_russell_1957_0705a_2.jpg
    59.8 KB · Views: 2
So, nah. . . . guys listen up. . . . .

count your blessings if your wife doesn't smoke, doesn't drink, and likes to shop. . . . that is, if she parks the car first. . . . .before going into the store.
 
I was thinking more like Gail Russel, for example. . .

well, say about 1949, maybe. . .. not 1960.

so the word on the street is, she was lesbian. . . . had a whole pack of personal demons, wrecked her car in a drive-in, drunk. . . . died at 36 in a pile of bottles. This is unbelievably depressing, somehow. . . .

In The Great Dan Patch she was the girl who understood. . . . .

I guess I forgot how to do pics. . . where's PKM?

what happened to all the free pics, anyway?

She could be beautiful:

gail-russell.jpg


MjAxMi02MDcxYmIwMTgwZTMxMjA0.png
 
yeah, I know she was beautiful. She did a credible job being a horse lover in her greatest movie, which I'd have titled "The Girl Who Understood". Loving horses, saving them from fire, and saving a stupid man from a loveless life. . . . all good.

She wasn't in another favorite movie of mine, though. . . . which also had a link to Dan Patch. . .. and which I love despite its Disney maker....... "So Dear To My Heart", which has another theme about a woman who understood, in Granny...... who was the best sort of "mother", a mother who understood a boy.

Too bad we can't rewrite history and have Gail Russel and Burl Ives raising Tom Sawyer, or Huck Finn, somehow. . . ..

Someday maybe I'll write a screenplay about "The Boy Who Understood" a clueless but good mother. . . . .
 
Babe's History of Property

Precedents: They Ain't What They're Cracked Up To Be

In regard to legal precedents, the first precedents were acted out by apes swinging in the trees, thumping their chests, and saying "Mine". In that era, Might made Right, and the five-hundred pound gorilla could just stomp in and have whatever he wanted. "Law" was defined at first glance by the power of psychological intimidation; if that failed at any point, the last definition was by force.

Since then we've had tribal chiefs, warlords, kings with soldiers, priests, priests with kings, kings with priests, emperors, and elected officials who could bedazzle the populace with rhetorical generalities while picking the pockets of lobbyists, and, finally, cult idols who could do it all. . . . .

history is replete with new paradigms of legal "precedence", all on the verge of being displaced by changing "interests" with the ear of the judges, or changing politicians whose ears are attuned to campaign financiers and lobbyists. . . .

If you're in the class of the "little people" you've got to find some kind of way to mobilize the masses, just like you. . . . .. vote the crooks out and replace them with new crooks.
 
Precedents: They Ain't What They're Cracked Up To Be

In regard to legal precedents, the first precedents were acted out by apes swinging in the trees, thumping their chests, and saying "Mine". In that era, Might made Right, and the five-hundred pound gorilla could just stomp in and have whatever he wanted. "Law" was defined at first glance by the power of psychological intimidation; if that failed at any point, the last definition was by force.

Since then we've had tribal chiefs, warlords, kings with soldiers, priests, priests with kings, kings with priests, emperors, and elected officials who could bedazzle the populace with rhetorical generalities while picking the pockets of lobbyists, and, finally, cult idols who could do it all. . . . .

history is replete with new paradigms of legal "precedence", all on the verge of being displaced by changing "interests" with the ear of the judges, or changing politicians whose ears are attuned to campaign financiers and lobbyists. . . .

If you're in the class of the "little people" you've got to find some kind of way to mobilize the masses, just like you. . . . .. vote the crooks out and replace them with new crooks.

2qc74_zpsf55fc599.jpg


If you are going to go Darwinian in your story you might as well start with the fish.

The history of property set to music:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZxnBSb4OKeU
 
Whose Grass is This?

Gold Butte, Nevada:

just across the Muddy/Virgin confluence with the Colorado from the "Lost City". Go to Overton, Nevada someday and see the Lost City Museum. This is my ancestral home. . . . uhhhmmm..... not the Lost City, but Overton, NV. Yah I grew up in St. George because my mom married a guy from St. George. He left when I was born and went to work in Henderson, Nevada, an hour down the shoreline of Lake Mead. . . .

The Paiutes native to the area are a related bunch to the Shoshone natives who inhabited most of Nevada, who still have a legal treaty claim to most of the land in Nevada. A treaty that legally trumps any federal claims to the right to administer indian lands, but which the whites with their government have always had the power to just ignore. Anybody know how many treaties the US government has conveniently disregarded, how many judges have turned blind eyes to the facts???

The Mexicans never "conquered" these people. The Mexicans patronized slave traders who exploited Ute natives who would raid into the areas occupied by paiute bands, called "digger indians" by Fremont and other whites migrating through their areas. They were peaceable when first encountered. Some northern bands, like the Goshutes, did become pretty difficult to manage as they raided white caravans, but they were pretty much just folks living in the river bottoms digging roots and growing a few veggies, hunting game and gathering pine nuts.

But the Mexicans claimed their land on the same legal theory that Spain owned all the land ever pronounced as theirs by bands of explorers waving their arms across wide horizons in the New World.

Then the United States marched some troops down to Mexico and killed a bunch of Mexicans, and forced Mexico to sign a treaty giving the United States the Shoshone lands. Under the impetus of "Manifest Destiny", the American government of that time had a clearly understood policy of rounding up natives and putting them on reservations, and making them wards of the State living lives of abject poverty under conditions that couldn't be better designed to decimate their population if they were true racists and eugenicists hell-bent on genocide. Socialism's laboratory, so to speak.

But for the whites, it was understand that all the new land should be deeded out to settlers or at least grazed by white folks' cattle. It was the understanding of all "Americans" that all the lands gained by purchase or war or treaty should be developed by American citizens, mostly white.

Every territory had land offices and county recorders' offices set up for the explicit recordings of deeds. The evidence needed for a deed? Build a shack, mark some boundaries, and it's yours. Congress later began to make some laws to regulate the process and keep ranchers and settlers from just having range wars and extermination wars against one another, yah.. . ..But nobody was really thinking the FEDERAL government was going into the Landlord business. . . . .

That change occurred at the turn of the century, around 1902, and was made gradually, subtly, without advertisement. One act after another expanded regulation, cemented control, and locked people out of the federal land. By the 1970s, the federal lockout began in earnest under the propaganda of the environmental movement. We were told it was "our" public land, we were told "multiple use" needed to be better managed. Then we were told that the turtles, fish, pond scum, and gnats needed protection, and had to be given priority because if these died off, we'd be next.

That was only half true. The turtles, fish, pond scum and gnats are not going to die out, but the world population needs to be reduced to one billion or less.

So now we are all being rounded up and put on reservations, called cites today, and given socialist rations just like we did to the native Americans.

Folks who go on supporting this kind of government policy today are a new breed, perhaps, but still "racist" eugenicists who want the earth to belong to them and their kids. Well, nah.. .. most of the folks who do this are not on the list which the elites are really going to reserve the earth for. . . . .just dupes who don't know what's really going on, as they shuffle into the corrals and take their place in the butcher's parade.
 
Back
Top