yamers
Well-Known Member
what would we even get? Boston has nothing.
https://www.celticsblog.com/2014/1/...ld-the-celtics-make-a-play-for-gordon-hayward
https://www.celticsblog.com/2014/1/...ld-the-celtics-make-a-play-for-gordon-hayward
Jazz don't need Rondo
No one would get excited about David Green.
Celtics would be fools to part with an unprotected pick
Even if DL could work out a deal that had some long term advantages, this would be a nightmare PR move. The Jazz will be trading their best player for the second time in 4 years.
What does this tell the casual Jazz fan?
1. Sell high. 2. Laugh.
Hayward is replaceable in FA for 1/2 the cost.
The Celtics have number of other teams picks.
See-- https://www.nbadraft.net/nba_draft_trades/2014
Jeff Green is worth something. If the Celtics are willing to talk Hayward and Jefferson for Green 2 first round picks and filler- we'll talk. Heck I would take 2 first round picks and filler.
Other than their own pick, Boston's first round pick this year (most certainly from Atlanta) and next year (from LAC) will be somewhere in the 18-30 range.
I wouldn't be excited about either one of these picks unless there was another move down the road to package them for something else. Try selling that as a reason for trading their best player.
The Celtics have number of other teams picks.
See-- https://www.nbadraft.net/nba_draft_trades/2014
Jeff Green is worth something. If the Celtics are willing to talk Hayward and Jefferson for Green 2 first round picks and filler- we'll talk. Heck I would take 2 first round picks and filler.
Oh really? So what free agent can the Jazz nab that will throw down 17 5 and 5 a night?
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];748172 said:the Celtics would not include their own pick this year + Green.
/topic
Jeff green is averaging 16 points and 5 rebounds at least so thats not too bad....... throw in a lottery pick, and green plus whoever we draft with bostons pick can probably easily surpass those numbers
Plus we would probably get worse while the new lineups and players get chemistry with one another, making our own lottery pick better.
what would we even get? Boston has nothing.
https://www.celticsblog.com/2014/1/...ld-the-celtics-make-a-play-for-gordon-hayward
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];748166 said:So your problem comes down to PR? or to bball?
What does the PR department want to pay Hayward?
What does the bball department want to pay Hayward?
As one of the biggest Hayward homers, and thanks to the fact we have Burks, I wouldn't hesitate to pull the trigger on this as long as one of the picks is the Boston pick, but doubt they do that.The Celtics have number of other teams picks.
See-- https://www.nbadraft.net/nba_draft_trades/2014
Jeff Green is worth something. If the Celtics are willing to talk Hayward and Jefferson for Green 2 first round picks and filler- we'll talk. Heck I would take 2 first round picks and filler.
Then **** em
Jazz don't need Rondo
No one would get excited about David Green or Olynyk.
Celtics would be fools to part with an unprotected pick
Even if DL could work out a deal that had some long term advantages, this would be a nightmare PR move. The Jazz would be trading their best player for the second time in 4 years.
What does this tell the casual Jazz fan?
I'm not really talking about right or wrong or money - I am talking about how a franchise is perceived when they keep pawning off their best players without net improvement. If you were an NBA player would you sign a 4 year deal with this organization? If you were a coach would you join their staff? If you were not a diehard fan would you spend your money to come and see them play?