What's new
By:

NBA Skinny: Trade deadline chatter by Matt Buser @yahoo

Darkwing Duck said:
Why would Charlotte have Bell in the deal? They traded him last year, and Larry Brown isn't on the team anymore, and Bell has a contract for 3 more years and this trade would obviously be financial for them. Not directed at you, but people need to actually think of implications for the other team rather than having their heads up their own asses.
Click to expand...

I just took that from a previous post. Pretty much included him to relieve some of our wing problems if we add 2 wing players. But your probably right they would not want him.

I want to get rid of Bell. Although he has played better lately and I would actually like him if he was getting 15-20 instead of 35+.
 
gregbroncs said:
I just took that from a previous post. Pretty much included him to relieve some of our wing problems if we add 2 wing players. But your probably right they would not want him.

I want to get rid of Bell. Although he has played better lately and I would actually like him if he was getting 15-20 instead of 35+.
Click to expand...

Again, wasn't meant at you. You're just replying to something that was put in already.

Charlotte has no incentive to take Bell. This type of trade filler, should Charlotte request one, would require Heyward or Watson. Watson expires. Heyward is a young asset.
 
Darkwing Duck said:
Again, wasn't meant at you. You're just replying to something that was put in already.

Charlotte has no incentive to take Bell. This type of trade filler, should Charlotte request one, would require Heyward or Watson. Watson expires. Heyward is a young asset.
Click to expand...

Right, more acknowledged at me. But if you read my post, I already admitted it's a fantasy and would be awesome in what is obviously a fantasy world frame of mind. Relax dude.
 
Darkwing Duck said:
Again, wasn't meant at you. You're just replying to something that was put in already.

Charlotte has no incentive to take Bell. This type of trade filler, should Charlotte request one, would require Heyward or Watson. Watson expires. Heyward is a young asset.
Click to expand...

Understood, I was just explaining myself a little bit. And I agree with you. But if it was Hayward or Watson included instead of Bell I don't think I would be as quick to back the trade. Part of the incentive to do this deal (for the Jazz) and take on this many financial problems would be unloading a little bit of the money they are already paying for the wing position. I would love to include Price and Bell but do not know if Charlotte would have any interest in Price either.
 
Does anyone who loves Jackson so much understand that he averages 16 shots a game? Or that he averages an absurd 37 minutes a game which inflates all his per game numbers?
 
Sounds nice, but as Darkwing Duck mentioned, this is a bad trade financially. Has anyone else thought the Jazz are holding on to Kirilenko because they think they can re-sign him next year for 4-6 mil a year? With AK already mentioning he wants to stay in Utah, I think the Jazz are biting the bullet this year on his huge contract to be able to give him an affordable deal next year that is good for both parties.
 
I don't even want to talk about trades because the end result will be a profanity laced tirade because no move was made.
 
To be fair, the Jazz moving to get Jefferson was a bold move even if it SEEMED lopsided. I'm pretty sure that's the most money the Jazz have taken on in a trade, regardless of how much they sent out.

The Jazz did a few things in the last year that allowed me to believe they don't just sit around on twitter and make fun of their fanbase. And it is fair to say that this team is still trying to figure out what they're doing.
 
THis trade is a no brainer. Wallace and Jackson would improve scoring and toughness. DO IT!! [/QUOTE


i think this trade also adds some toughness in jazz's private jets, these 2 players will easily get into arguments and fights on jazz's private jets, just like O.J Mayo and Tony did.
Click to expand...
 
This "rumor", the way I read it, sounds more to me like an author's poorly worded attempt to compare salaries. As if to say, "can you believe he makes as much as those two put together?"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top