D
Deleted member 365
Guest
What will it cost to re-sign Burks?
Burks is better than Hayward sooooo... What's greater than the max?
What will it cost to re-sign Burks?
According to David Locke...
Believe my math is correct here after Jazz match Hayward they can still take on 8.7 million. Before they sign Hayward have around 15 M
Burks is better than Hayward sooooo... What's greater than the max?
And the same with Enes. Both will ask for the moon and Lindsey will decline. Then we'll all bitch about the short-sightedness of Dennis in not just giving them whatever they wanted before they get big offers during next season's free agency period.Im guessing 9 million per year will be offered to him this off season...... and after what he just saw hayward get offered he will decline and hope to have a great year and get more
Burks is better than Hayward sooooo... What's greater than the max?
And the same with Enes. Both will ask for the moon and Lindsey will decline. Then we'll all bitch about the short-sightedness of Dennis in not just giving them whatever they wanted before they get big offers during next season's free agency period.
Jazz should ONLY take on salary dumps at this point. There is no one out there who is a true impact player/building block that should get minutes ahead of any of the current roster players. Let's see if anyone becomes available at the deadline.
Burke (35), Exum (13)
Burks (30), Exum (12), Clark? (6)
Hayward (33), Hood (15)
Kanter (30), Favors (5), Novak (13)
Favors (28), Gobert (20)
Or cross out Clark and give minutes at the SG to Hayward and more time to Hood, etc. Or play Exum 30 mins/per. There are a lot of ways to go.
And I haven't even put in Evans!
As much as I like Marvin as a versatile backup, I think he's just too old to be brought back and take minutes away from the youngsters. Hood can provide the shooting Marvin provided at the 3. And Murphy should get a shot at the stretch-4.
I agree. Where this team is on the growth curve, there is no reason to keep Marvin around. He will give us more talent for a couple years, at the detriment of the future (by taking away valuable minutes that our core need to develop).
Most the people I talk to outside the interwebs think we should bring on some more vets to pressure the young guys to earn their minutes. It builds character having better players in front of you like Marvin and Richard to chase down.
Most the people I talk to outside the interwebs think we should bring on some more vets to pressure the young guys to earn their minutes. It builds character having better players in front of you like Marvin and Richard to chase down.
Most the people I talk to outside the interwebs think we should bring on some more vets to pressure the young guys to earn their minutes. It builds character having better players in front of you like Marvin and Richard to chase down.
We won't have any money left after the Hayward signing - that's the whole point (taking into account what we'll have to pay Burks and Kanter later on)