Not for a minute do I think this is all on Dennis Lindsey. I think he's been frustrated and that's why he mentioned the "extras" a Utah coach needs to do - e.g. Jr. Jazz, allowing Millers in the locker room, etc. And Rigby has since said the Jazz "marry" their coach. In sum, it's a weird job to be HC of the Utah Jazz.
Hindsight is great: Hornacek was unproven as a coach; he wasn't even the first assistant. Why not hire Earl Watson this year? They have about the same pedigree. Budenholzer? Highly-regarded assistant. Same category as Snyder and Griffin. Brad Stevens: successful college coach, but who knows what he'll do in the NBA. He was given a tanking team. Had the Jazz wanted, I'm sure they could have gone after a college coach.
I agree with a lot of what you've said, but allow me to expand on my earlier points -
A. It's definitely a unique position, but the plain and simple fact is that MONEY TALKS. For all the extras, if the Jazz will pay their coach well, good candidates will consider the position. Especially because of the run that Sloan had before he resigned. The Jazz are loyal to their coaches. It's a good community for coaches (and their families) to live in and they do have some young talent to work with.
B. The Millers sabotaged any chance that DL might have had to make a coaching change last year. Because they are so loyal, they didn't see the writing on the wall. Ty Corbin was done before the season ever began. My personal opinion was that they should have accelerated this process last year because I'm pretty sure that DL knew he was going to "go lean" and then hire a new coach after the season was over.
C. As such, Jeff Hornacek was already in the building and was highly regarded by the young players that this team has decided to focus on and build around. He is well-liked in the community and many viewed him as a quality head coaching candidate. When he started being mentioned as a viable head coaching candidate, many felt that the Jazz should at least consider the possibility of making the switch before another team could steal him.
D. Mike Budenholzer - again, those who wanted the team to just make the coaching change before the tank year liked him because he was a highly considered assistant for the Spurs and had a well-known relationship with Dennis Lindsey from that experience. That's a little different from Snyder and Griffin. They had worked together before and would already know what to expect from that arrangement. Brett Brown would have fit that profile too. That's the main reason why I would have included them on this list.
E. Brad Stevens - Was a young coach who was known for his analytical approach to coaching and having success with less talent than most of the teams he faced. He might be an unknown and a gamble at the NBA level, but I thought that it would have been one worth taking. Again, those who felt that a new coach was an inevitability were hoping for this kind of a hire. It sure didn't hurt that one of his top college players is one of the faces of the franchise either.
It's only hindsight if you weren't banging the drum before any of these guys were hired. I know that I was hoping that they'd make the move last year and then use the new coach's first season as a learning experience to see what the young guys were capable of doing with bigger roles and more support. It didn't happen. I just hope that they didn't miss out on three damn near perfect potential candidates last year and have to settle for a step down from that quality of coach, just because the Millers weren't willing to let go of Corbin a year too early instead of too late.