What's new

Oh Good! A War With Iran!

I will again direct you to my post where I said that you've developed a nasty habit of deliberately changing what I'm saying.

I don't mind if you don't agree with me, but please don't purposefully change my words.
Man, you literally said "when everyone who disagrees becomes a misogynistic racist Nazi you tend to rub people the wrong way" in reference to a post about Thriller. Own your ****.
 
He claims he’s not worried about Mueller... but this unhinged interview doesn’t provide much comfort.











@Zombie @Red what do you make of this?
 
Man, you literally said "when everyone who disagrees becomes a misogynistic racist Nazi you tend to rub people the wrong way" in reference to a post about Thriller. Own your ****.

I had to look back through ignored posters to see what you were referring to. Jeez. And the crazies on this site wonder why I put them on ignore?

“Stop changing my words to mean different things than I intended! Oh wait, you’re quoting me? Oh well... uhhh... stop putting my own words into my mouth! Thriller sucks!”
 
Man, you literally said "when everyone who disagrees becomes a misogynistic racist Nazi you tend to rub people the wrong way" in reference to a post about Thriller. Own your ****.

1) I said people like Thriller. Similar to. Do you understand the concept, or do I have to walk you through it?

2) I made no reference towards myself. I never said Thriller, or anybody else called me a Nazi. So yes, you are more than free to quote what I said. As you said, "own your ****." If you can't come up with a proper argument without making things up, then this is rather pointless.

3) I am not defending people liking Trump. I am trying to explain the thought process of people in these situations. There's a categorical difference between those two. Like I said, I do not care if you don't agree. Just don't say that I'm saying **** I didn't.
 
1) I said people like Thriller. Similar to. Do you understand the concept, or do I have to walk you through it?

2) I made no reference towards myself. I never said Thriller, or anybody else called me a Nazi. So yes, you are more than free to quote what I said. As you said, "own your ****." If you can't come up with a proper argument without making things up, then this is rather pointless.

3) I am not defending people liking Trump. I am trying to explain the thought process of people in these situations. There's a categorical difference between those two. Like I said, I do not care if you don't agree. Just don't say that I'm saying **** I didn't.
The quote you replied to specifically mentioned Thriller, and you said "everyone you disagree with" so are you saying you agree with Thriller then? Or did you not really mean that Thriller and people like him don't actually call everyone they disagree with Nazis? Hmmm.

Maybe word your posts differently if you don't want people making inferences you don't intend them to.
 
The quote you replied to specifically mentioned Thriller, and you said "everyone you disagree with" so are you saying you agree with Thriller then? Or did you not really mean that Thriller and people like him don't actually call everyone they disagree with Nazis? Hmmm.

Maybe word your posts differently if you don't want people making inferences you don't intend them to.

Huh? The post I responded to said "liberals (Thriller)." So unless Thriller is multiple people, it clearly wasn't *just* him.

I had assumed the "you" that I used was a rather obvious example of the collective you, as it clearly wasn't directly toward you. I apologize if that was misunderstood. When I said "everyone", it was hyperbole meant to make a point, again, I thought rather obvious, but perhaps not.

I'll remember in the future if I ever choose to discuss with you to simplify things further. My apologies.

The point I was trying to make was, and is, simple. It has been made, so I think I'll be finished here. Enjoy your day, there's some beautiful weather today. :)
 
"European nations were set up to take advantage of the United States."

This one statement alone should be enough to make everyone recognize its all just a con. Guys a con, a gansta. How absurd. Goes to show you the cream isn't exactly rising to the top these days, lol...
 
Bluster and bullshite. And Republicunts(at least the ones who like Trump) have a huge appetite for ******** these days. Unfortunately everyone else has to eat from their plate. Why can't anyone from the R party redirect the party compass? I respect Mitt for giving it a shot but few from his party put sanity before party these days.
 
Last edited:
Huh? The post I responded to said "liberals (Thriller)." So unless Thriller is multiple people, it clearly wasn't *just* him.

I had assumed the "you" that I used was a rather obvious example of the collective you, as it clearly wasn't directly toward you. I apologize if that was misunderstood. When I said "everyone", it was hyperbole meant to make a point, again, I thought rather obvious, but perhaps not.

I'll remember in the future if I ever choose to discuss with you to simplify things further. My apologies.

The point I was trying to make was, and is, simple. It has been made, so I think I'll be finished here. Enjoy your day, there's some beautiful weather today. :)
I think the problem with making general references or categorizing people is that you are attacking people who don't deserve it. Not only that, but it's a mechanism used by autocratic governments to divide people instead of allowing for constructive criticism that often leads to a deeper understanding for both sides.
 
Back
Top