What's new

Power Rankings

and lol at using a suspicious measurement to the top of someone's head as the sole piece of evidence in a discussion about size. You are a goddamn idiot.
 
it's you who is credulous. Not me.

I see a guy who is 6' on a good day, light as a feather, with a short wingspan. He's a small guard. Duh.

This is certainly possible, as many players are shorter than their reported heights. However, Tony Parker is still a hell of a lot closer to average than Isiah Thomas, who is legitimately a small guard, and who also is probably shorter than his reported height 5'9".

Parker is not a good comparison when discussing IT. Nate Robinson and Spud Webb are a lot better. Now, if only Snow White could locate the other 4 dwarfs.
 
The discussion was about small guards. IMO, all 175 lbs of Parker qualifies him for inclusion in that list.
 
Fine, call Parker a small guard. Then we can call Isiah a mini guard or something. Just so long as we aren't lumping guys who are slightly smaller than average in with guys who aren't big enough to ride the rollercoaster at Lagoon.
 
Either way there is still precedent for a small guard leading a championship team. I'm not arguing that the current Isaiah Thomas can or will do that but the comment that a "midget" can't lead a championship team is stupid.
 
Fine, call Parker a small guard. Then we can call Isiah a mini guard or something. Just so long as we aren't lumping guys who are slightly smaller than average in with guys who aren't big enough to ride the rollercoaster at Lagoon.
I agree with the Smurf. Using Parker as proof that IT is big enough is stoooopid.
 
Either way there is still precedent for a small guard leading a championship team. I'm not arguing that the current Isaiah Thomas can or will do that but the comment that a "midget" can't lead a championship team is stupid.

Yeah, so many 5'9 PGs winning rings.
 
Yeah, so many 5'9 PGs winning rings.

Pretty small sample size actually. How many PG under 6 feet have there been in the NBA? Still doesn't mean it can't happen. Unless you are just prophesying or trolling again. Either way it's still a ridiculous assertion.
 
Either way there is still precedent for a small guard leading a championship team. I'm not arguing that the current Isaiah Thomas can or will do that but the comment that a "midget" can't lead a championship team is stupid.

What was stupid was the comment that Boston was in a better position because they had an all star and Utah didn't.

So for all the posters with a dwarf fetish, how many Utah players would you take over Isiah Thomas? I'm taking 3 as of now with at least 1 Or 2 Borderline. Defense counts.
 
What was stupid was the comment that Boston was in a better position because they had an all star and Utah didn't.

So for all the posters with a dwarf fetish, how many Utah players would you take over Isiah Thomas? I'm taking 3 as of now with at least 1 Or 2 Borderline. Defense counts.

Not sure why your quoting me. I never made any comments about that. I was only attacking the absurd assertion that a shorter guard cannot lead a championship team.
 
Pretty small sample size actually. How many PG under 6 feet have there been in the NBA? Still doesn't mean it can't happen. Unless you are just prophesying or trolling again. Either way it's still a ridiculous assertion.

So whenever anyone disagrees with you it's trolling?
 
Not sure why your quoting me. I never made any comments about that. I was only attacking the absurd assertion that a shorter guard cannot lead a championship team.

It's an absurd notion yet it has happened only twice in NBA history with Isiah Thomas in 89 and 90?
 
What was stupid was the comment that Boston was in a better position because they had an all star and Utah didn't.

So for all the posters with a dwarf fetish, how many Utah players would you take over Isiah Thomas? I'm taking 3 as of now with at least 1 Or 2 Borderline. Defense counts.

Boston was more efficient on defense than Utah last season.
 
Back
Top