carolinajazz has been posting on Jazzfanz, in whatever form, since 1999, and his posts have not changed substantially. Whatever his connection to Philip, he is not a 20-or-so college junior.
Science vs. Creationism
- Thread starter dodo
- Start date
carolinajazz has been posting on Jazzfanz, in whatever form, since 1999, and his posts have not changed substantially. Whatever his connection to Philip, he is not a 20-or-so college junior.
Unfortunately, carolinajazz is a fairly typical Creationist.
carolinajazz
Well-Known Member
...so if I want to copy and paste someones viewpoint and/or observation...what's wrong with that? Saves me time for one and the wording, as expressed by the individuals I'm using are stated so very clearly and eloquently, I could hardly improve on it! I'm sure they don't hold it against me that I use their sound reasoning on the subject to shoot down your bogus, pathetic and feeble attempt at discrediting a Grand Creator and Designer!
Darkwing Duck
Well-Known Member
How is flawed, inaccurate, and ignorant reasoning sound and factual, scientific evidence bogus, pathetic and feeble?
Oh wait, the answer is indoctrination.
carolinajazz
Well-Known Member
One of the most effective pitches evolutionists use to sell their theory is their claim that the fossil record supports evolution. This could not be farther from the truth; in fact the fossil record provides powerful and overwhelming evidence that evolution did not occur on earth.
The fossil record is an overwhelming and devastating contradiction to evolution. Here’s the catch, the magic behind the illusion!
Whenever an evolutionist presents his line of evidence for evolution in the fossil record, he will without fail, virtually every time, present a vertebrate transitional fossil. Why is this important? The evolutionist is failing to mention to his audience that vertebrates constitute less than .01% of the entire fossil record, and of these fossils, most species are represented by a bone or less! What about the other 99.99% of the fossil record?
That’s the other key piece of information the evolutionist is withholding. Complex invertebrates make up the vast majority of this portion of the record, roughly 95%. We have cataloged literally millions of different species of these very complex creatures, and we have entire fossils, not just pieces here and there. In this rich and virtually complete portion of the fossil record, there is not a single sign of evolution, whatsoever!!!
If evolution were true, the fossil record should be littered with countless examples showing many different transitions leading up to the millions of species of these complex creatures. YET WE DO NOT HAVE A SINGLE EXAMPLE! NOT EVEN ONE! The remarkable completeness of this vast portion of the fossil record thwarts evolutionists from cooking up "transitionals" because speculation is not so easy when you have entire specimens. There is not the wild guesswork inherent when dealing with willy-nilly fragments of a tooth here, a leg bone there!
In the small portion that includes insects, again we find no fossil evidence of evolution, whatsoever!
The problems only get worse for the evolutionist. Not only is there no sign of evolution leading up to the complex invertebrates, but also missing in action are the enormous number of transitionals that must have existed to bridge the gap between invertebrates and vertebrates. The transformation from invertebrate to vertebrate would have been a major event in the earth’s evolutionary history. Yet the fossil record does not leave a single shred of evidence for this enormous transformation!
The nightmare gets worse for the evolutionist when we consider that the wide diversity of body plans that suddenly appear in this brief 2 to 3 million year window are markedly distinct morphologically from each other. This disparity of body plans is followed by stasis, where there are no incremental alterations to the body plans through the entire history of the fossil record up to the present! This is precisely what one would expect if special creation were true, and a stark contradiction to evolution.
So all that is left is a sliver of a corner of the fossil record, the vertebrates. This is the rabbit in the hat for the evolutionist. The bulk of this sliver is made up of fish, where we again find no sign of evolution whatsoever. A small remainder of this miniscule sliver is left for the land-dwelling vertebrates. Of the land-dwelling vertebrate species unearthed, 95% are represented by a bone or less. Yet this is where the evolutionist concentrates all his efforts to "show" to his audience that "the fossil record supports evolution"! Their audience is completely unaware that all of the examples they are being shown come from an incredibly puny section marred with incomplete data.
They are conveniently left in the dark regarding the other 99.99% of the data, from a portion of the fossil record that is far more complete, that shows NO HINT OF EVOLUTION WHATSOEVER! This is their sleight-of-hand. This is a sham. This is brainwashing. There is no other way to put it!
carolinajazz
Well-Known Member
...what does my basketball avatar have to do with this discussion and debate about evolution? I chose that avatar way back when hip hop basketball and the "AND 1" league were in there heyday....and I thought it was funny!
Indoctrination works both ways.
MVP
Well-Known Member
Says who? You??? lol.
Invertebrate evolution is well documented and studied. Every new false claim of yours just makes you look more and more ignorant and desperate. I suggest you finish with one claim/argument, which we dismissed before jumping to the other one. As we already denied countless false statements of yours and yet you are still desperately trying to find some kind of straw to support your "creator". I admire the effort, but you need to learn to lose with dignity one day.
Everybody gets indoctrinated .
Religion indoctrinates it's members.
Gov't indoctrinates it's citizens.
Business indoctrinates it's consumers.
Science indoctrinates it's students.
♪alt13
Well-Known Member
Because it is named cj_avatar2.gif and it is stored on the Uof U site and phillips directory. It makes me think that CJ is just your sick alter ego.
♪alt13
Well-Known Member
Yeah I can't believe that that that page was put up after 1999 though. It looks like no one realizes it's still there.