Wrong.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Situs_inversus (mirrored)
The reason the 1st is so rare, is because it often results in severe health problems--
which is an argument for evolution in and of itself.
"Situs inversus is thought to be present in 0.01% of the population, or a 1 in 10,000 chance."
....you guys love to play those "long odds" don't ya? Julian Huxley, who, it is said--and he of all things a "bastion of the theory of evolution"--determined that "the odds of the evolution of the horse were
1 in 1000 to the power of 1,000,000." One might immediately wonder how someone who believed this could still be a defender of evolution--after all,
if those really were the odds against the evolution of the horse, who would buy evolution as a sensible explanation?
"A proportion of
favorable mutations of one in a thousand does not sound much, but is probably generous . . And a total of a million mutational steps sounds a great deal but is
probably an understatement.. However, let us take these figures as being reasonable estimates. With this proportion, but without any selection, we should
clearly have to breed a million strains (a thousand squared) to get one containing two favorable mutations; and so on, up to a thousand to the millionth power to get one containing a million. Of course this could not really happen, but it is a
useful way of visualizing the fantastic odds against getting a number of favorable mutations in one strain through pure chance alone. A thousand to the millionth power, when written out,
becomes the figure 1 with three million noughts after it; and that would take three large volumes of about 500 pages each, just to print) . . No one would bet on anything so improbable happening. And yet it has happened) It has happened, thanks to the working of natural selection and the properties of living substance which make natural selection inevitable)" *Julian Huxley, Evolution in Action (1953), p. 41.
Five favorable mutations could never occur within the lifetime of an individual yet billions would have had to occur within a few minutes in order for it to survive!
"The frequency with which a single non harmful mutation is known to once mutate is about 1 in 1000. The probability that two favorable mutations would occur is 1 in 103 X 10', in a million. Studies of Drosophila have revealed that large numbers of genes are involved in the formation of the separate structural elements. There may be 30,E involved in a single wing structure. It is moat unlikely that fewer than five genders could ever be involved in the formation of even the simplest new structure, previously unknown in the organism.
The probability now becomes one in one thousand million million. We already know that mutations in living cells appear once in ten million to once in one hundred thousand million.
It is evident that the probability of five favorable mutations occurring within a single life cycle of an organism is effectively zero." *E. Ambrose, The Nature and Origin of the Biological World (1982), p. 120.
