Still don't believe in evolution? Try this!

[LogGrad98]

Were caves intelligently designed?

 

[carolinajazz]

The funny thing is CJ that, if you would pay attention, mostly I support your position in these debates, at least I provide a counterpoint on that side to your often insane point. In this case I made the comment entirely tongue in cheek. It was an OBVIOUS play on the time-worn yet effective "it depends on what the definition of 'is' is". You were the only one on the board who didn't catch that and took it literally and then extrapolated from that single comment an entire personal life philosophy for me, counter to actual comments I have made many times on this board openly, and in direct conflict with my attempts to temper these conversations with some humor and at the same time give some minor level of support to the creationist standpoint.

....well, then, I hope you accept my apology! However, it wasn't so "obvious" to me that your were not stating your firm position on the definition of "decency".....which is why I took the offensive on this issue. Again, my deepest apologies!

 

[LogGrad98]

It's all good. But at the same time different groups do have different definitions for subjects like that. Differences in That kind of basic thought on human nature habe spurred wars and mistreatment for centuries.

 

[PearlWatson]

I said secularism fosters peach and harmony.

I love peaches.

 

[PearlWatson]

Sure.
Not sure why you're doing this, seeing as this in no way refutes that you asked me to inquire my professor on a particular question.
Well, I am sure why you're doing this-- trying to shift attention away from your idiocy. I get it.
Pearl walks in with all the confidence of a 5 year old going to kindergarten for the first time, but then forgets the basic tenets of reading comprehension.
Tell me, PearlSapa: where did I ever say that I would be showing my professor these posts in order to reply to you? Even if I was serious with these posts, I would simply let him read through some of the posts at the absolute most.
I didn't say anything of the sort, because I had no desire to involve him in these discussions. He has better things to do than carry conversations with you. Why should he stoop down to your intellect (or lack thereof)?
Special caveat: I said I would show this conversation to an evolutionary biology-- but when you implored me to ask a professor about my post regarding the significance of the "PhD", I asked my research supervisor.
He doesn't have a PhD in Evo-Bio. I work in a prostate cancer research lab. He has a PhD in Cell Biology.
So, as always, you lose.

It is so adorable every time you declare yourself winner of our retarded internet exchanges.
It doesn't matter which of your real or imagined Ph.D. bffs you assure us agrees with you 100% to discount their own degree; I was just using your silly pronouncement that you were going to read through this thread with your "evolutionary biology" professor as an opportunity to mock "evolutionary biology."

 

[Deleted member 848]

It is so adorable every time you declare yourself winner of our retarded internet exchanges.

I'm beginning to feel bad for you.

It doesn't matter which of your real or imagined Ph.D. bffs you assure us agrees with you 100% to discount their own degree

Discount their own degree according to you. I'm sure no one really cares what you have to say pertaining the intricacies of academia, for a plethora of reasons.

I was just using your silly pronouncement that you were going to read through this thread with your "evolutionary biology" professor as an opportunity to mock "evolutionary biology."

No, you're trying to distract attention away from the fact that you're getting clowned in this thread.






Swing and miss. Par for the course I'm afraid.