What's new

Stockton ranked 3rd!

Did Stockton ever, in his life, play on a team where a bench player could even DREAM of winning Finals MVP?


Get ur head checked bruh

grow up you little toddler.

Did Curry ever play with a Hall of Fame coach, and the best power forward ever? derpdy derr. gotcha with your same stupid ****. Curry should have been the MVP anyways. They got that **** wrong.

You also can't play with a finals MVP if you don't win the finals. I thought you knew this?

Your logic sucks.
 
Last edited:
Curry is the best point guard ever. He is close to being the best player ever.

It so laughable that anyone would think Stockton is or was better than Curry. It's seriously not even close. Curry would smoke Stockton.

It's so dumb to try and argue that because Stockton racked up so many steals over a very long career in which he missed very few games, that he was better at the game or winning. Curry already has achieved the ultimate prize. Something Stockton couldn't do. Curry dominates the game.

The sum of a players career doesn't define their ability to win a game. Jason Terry has more career points than Kevin Durant. Would it make any ****ing sense at all to claim Jason Terry was a better than Kevin Durant? No it wouldn't.

I don't hate Stockton. I love him. I'm a big fan, but you have to be retarded to think he's better than Curry.

Curry is a better player right now than LeBron James in the prime of his career. Was Stockton better than LeBron?

You forgot Stockton having more assists than God. And his D. You have to look at everything when looking for who is best. not just one or two cherry picked areas.

Right now I think Stockton was a better all time PG than Curry based on everything. I also think that when it is all over Curry will quite possible go down as the best PG AND shooter ever.
 
You forgot Stockton having more assists than God. And his D. You have to look at everything when looking for who is best. not just one or two cherry picked areas.

Right now I think Stockton was a better all time PG than Curry based on everything. I also think that when it is all over Curry will quite possible go down as the best PG AND shooter ever.

Did you ever read the post? Do you even know why Stockton had all those assists?Do you even know what an assist is? Do you even know what assist means? You can get buckets without assists. You can't get assists without buckets. You can't spell assistant without assists. That's what John was, the assistant. He was helping a player who was better than him(Malone), who wasn't better than Lebron, who Curry is better than. So if Curry is better than LeBron, but Lebron is better than Malone, and Stockton was Malone's assistant, how would it make any sense at all to say Stockton is better than Curry?
 
Did you ever read the post? Do you even know why Stockton had all those assists?Do you even know what an assist is? Do you even know what assist means? You can get buckets without assists. You can't get assists without buckets. You can't spell assistant without assists. That's what John was, the assistant. He was helping a player who was better than him(Malone), who wasn't better than Lebron, who Curry is better than. So if Curry is better than LeBron, but Lebron is better than Malone, and Stockton was Malone's assistant, how would it make any sense at all to say Stockton is better than Curry?

lmfao, keep living up to that name.

10 x All Star
All Star game MVP
2 x NBA 1st Team
6 x NBA 2nd Team
3 x NBA 3rd Team
5 x NBA ALL D 2nd Team
9 x NBA Assist Leader
2 x NBA Steals Leader
All Time Steals leader
All Time Assist Leader
Only missed 23 games in his 19 year career

In summation rabble rabble rabble.

Edit: I am really enjoying watching Curry's legacy unfold. He's amazing. Cry harder and neg away.
 
Same old arguments about peak versus body of work and skill versus accomplishment.

Even if everyone agreed on the criteria, the "better" player is rather subjective. It would depend on which criteria you value most, and the context in which they played (as you see it), along with other non-quantifiable factors.
 
Same old arguments about peak versus body of work and skill versus accomplishment.

Even if everyone agreed on the criteria, the "better" player is rather subjective. It would depend on which criteria you value most, and the context in which they played (as you see it), along with other non-quantifiable factors.

I do think that if Curry has 1-2 more season like this one I will place him 2nd all time instead of 5th. Another 5-6 seasons like this and I will probably place him 1st lol.

You are right that different people value different things more or less. But I think that all of it has a role to play.
 
Stockton ****s Isiah bruh go phone home and change forums, u fairweather fan.

This bish of a Knick fan thinks he can walk in here and say **** like this. The **** outta here.

Did you miss that he was quoting Magic Johnson? It wasn't PG_AB's opinion.
 
Did you miss that he was quoting Magic Johnson? It wasn't PG_AB's opinion.

That's Dalamon for ya. He can't wait to try and talk down to someone. He has a know it all little teenager attitude. It isn't the first time he's done that.
 
Same old arguments about peak versus body of work and skill versus accomplishment.

Even if everyone agreed on the criteria, the "better" player is rather subjective. It would depend on which criteria you value most, and the context in which they played (as you see it), along with other non-quantifiable factors.

That's true, but I don't really see why go with the longevity and body of work, and the total number of stats. We are talking who is better, meaning who would win over the other. It's not a beauty pageant. It's about winning, and being able to beat your opponent. Otherwise, we could make all sorts of illogical judgments based on numbers, like saying Jason Terry is a better player than Durant because he has more career points. That's so stupid imo. If Durant had a career ending injury today, no one would say Terry was the better player.
 
Same old arguments about peak versus body of work and skill versus accomplishment.

Even if everyone agreed on the criteria, the "better" player is rather subjective. It would depend on which criteria you value most, and the context in which they played (as you see it), along with other non-quantifiable factors.

Here's how I'd look at it. Who would you rather have in a 7 game series? I'd prefer Isaiah.
 
Back
Top