What's new
By:
Filters

Submit to sloanfeld infidels

Sloanfeld

Sloanfeld

Banned
SUBMIT TO SLOANFELD INFIDELS x

OK I don't know much about this 'Beantown' cat but I do know that I was the number one Anti-Obama cat back in 2008 (along with my man toofs). If any of you think that's changed then you are wrong. I just don't sit here all day arguing like some of you (hope you have wives or your pads must be a ****-sty).

Now is y'alls time to man up and admit that you ****ed up, those of you who voted wrong two years ago. You don't even have to apologize. Just admit it, Sloanfeld was right.


WHO CAN STOP SLOANFELD?????????????


Mother ****ers.
 
What is a sloanfeld infidel? I have a feeling I am one. Are you telling me to submit to myself?

I asm very glad Obama, as opposed to McCain, has been President these last two years. McCain would never have been willing to approve the stimulus, and without that I see unemployment as being much worse than it is now.
 
Heres a really good story bout that:


Foxnews.com reports---->House of Representatives
House Approves $600M For More Drones, Agents at U.S.-Mexican Border

Published August 10, 2010
| Associated Press
Print Email Share Comments (5) Text Size WASHINGTON

WASHINGTON -- In a rare moment of bipartisanship Tuesday, the House approved $600 million to pay for more unmanned surveillance drones and about 1,500 more agents along the troubled Mexican border.

Getting tougher on border security is one of the few issues that both parties agree on in this highly charged election season. But lawmakers remain deeply divided over a more comprehensive approach to the illegal immigration problem, and it's unclear if Congress will go beyond border-tightening efforts.

The House passed the bill by an unrecorded voice vote after brief debate. The Senate passed an identical bill last week by unanimous consent. But senators must act again, for technical reasons, before sending the bill to President Barack Obama for his signature.

Some House members urged the Senate to act quickly, without waiting for Congress's summer recess to end in mid-September. It was unclear Tuesday whether that would happen.

The bill would offset its costs by raising fees on foreign-based personnel companies that use U.S. visa programs to bring skilled workers to the United States. These include the popular H-1B visa program. India says higher fees would discriminate against its companies and workers.

YOU MIGHT ALSO BE
INTERESTED IN
Best and Worst College Degrees for 2010 Grads What to Expect if Bush Tax Cuts Expire HP CEO Hurd Resigns After Sexual Harassment Investigation Friends of Laurence Fishburne Attempted to Block Sales of Daughter's Porn Video: Report FOXNews.com - Mystery Surrounds Suspected Murder of 3 Kids in Scotland by Their American Mom The bill includes $176 million for 1,000 new border patrol agents to form a strike force to be deployed at critical areas, $89 million for another 500 customs and immigration personnel, and $32 million to deploy unmanned aerial vehicles or drones.

It also provides $196 million for the Justice Department to bolster its forces of U.S. marshals, and FBI, DEA and ATF agents along the border.

Congress and the White House felt a greater urgency to act on border security after Arizona passed a law directing its law enforcement officers to be more aggressive in seeking out illegal immigrants. A federal judge struck down the law's main provisions, but many voters throughout the country favor crackdowns on illegal immigration.

Rep. Ann Kirkpatrick, D-Ariz., asked the Senate to move quickly. She said it's time for the federal government "to stop letting us down and start getting the job done" on tighter border security
 
Oh crap heres an other one bout that thing to:

A group of high school students attending a conservative leadership conference in Washington, D.C. said they were ordered by a security guard to stop singing the national anthem during a June 25 visit to the Lincoln Memorial.

“They told them to stop singing,” said Evan Gassman, a spokesman for the Young America’s Foundation. “I was taken aback. You wouldn’t expect a display of national patriotism to be censored."

U.S. Park Police confirmed that the students were in violation of federal law and their impromptu performance constituted a demonstration in an area that must remain “completely content neutral.”

“The area they were standing in and singing is an area that is restricted for this type of activity,” said Sgt. David Schlosser. “The United States Park Police is absolutely content-neutral when it comes to any sort of demonstrations in these areas.”

Schlosser explained that performances, regardless of content, are banned to “maintain a contemplative and reverent area for the Lincoln Memorial, for the other guests and visitors.”

YOU MIGHT ALSO BE
INTERESTED IN
Buffett's Dairy Queen Chilly on Frozen Yogurt Lawsuit Best and Worst College Degrees for 2010 Grads Ouch!10 Biggest Brand Nightmares of 2010 86 Days to Decide: Activists Say Tea Party Imposters Infiltrating Elections Federal Marshals Hunt for Escaped Ariz. Inmates in Yellowstone Park The incident occurred on June 25 as students were taking a monument tour of the nation’s capital. The decision to sing the national anthem at the memorial was a spur of the moment event, according to Shawn Balcomb, of Richmond Hill, GA.

“We got maybe two lines in and a police officer came over and he was yelling,” Balcomb said in a telephone interview. “He quieted us down.” Balcomb, 17, said the officer told the group they were being too loud. “I was dumbfounded,” he said.

“I didn’t realize there was something wrong with singing the national anthem.”

Schlosser said the students would have been in compliance had they moved approximately 25 steps from where they were standing.

“It’s not the content of their activity – that being the national anthem – it’s the location,” he said. “A couple steps and it would have been no problem whatsoever.”

Instead of doing as they were instructed, Gassman said the students resumed the song – an impromptu form of civil disobedience.

“If their idea of civil disobedience is singing the national anthem, then so be it,” Gassman said. “Let them disobey.”

YAF posted video reportedly shot just after the alleged encounter with the security officer. It shows students loudly singing the anthem.

“That’s the most offensive thing out of all this,” he said.

“They really did not provide the students a reason,” said Gassman. Balcomb, who is a high school senior, said they didn’t intend on creating a ruckus – they just wanted to show their patriotism.

“It’s not like we sounded great or anything,” he said.

“We just wanted to pay respect to our nation – in our capital.”

Schlosser, who commended the students on their musical ability, said the students were not cited and to his knowledge no report was filed.

“We need to make certain that all other visitors that don’t
 
and heres what WE THE PEOPLE ARE saying bout that thing!!!



This is truly dispicable
Tuesday, August 10, 2010 at 11:08 AM

margd

This is a tough one. On the one hand, telling people they can't sing the national anthem seems like a violation of the first amendment. Not to mention it's a national monument and the national anthem for heaven's sake. On the other hand, I've been to the Lincoln memorial many times and can confirm there is a very special atmosphere there. It is a place where most people lower their voices in awe a- it is a place conducive to contemplation and meditation on the issues that affect our country, then and in the past. It's almost church-like. The students should have moved the few steps out of consideration for the other people there, but I don't think they should have been forced to do so.
Tuesday, August 10, 2010 at 11:08 AM

bjgreen

joev5638 So someone told these kids to turn themselves into victims. You know what, they are. They are victims of a lost society where nothing is special. Everything is - don't offend someone. The rights of the few overtake the rights of the majority. This mall in Washington has held many events for the "down trodden" "causes" but god forbid anything patriotic ever happens in the sacred place. Oh, I'm sorry, you can't talk about god any more either. I remember a time when a person mught start singing and everyone else would join in. Are we so ashamed of our country that we can no longer show it? As Lynyrd Skynyrd says No, That Ain't My America.
Tuesday, August 10, 2010 at 11:07 AM

dave4yhvh

Exactly what we need as a people...courageous youth standing in civil disobedience to tyrants infringing on our inalienable God given rights!
Tuesday, August 10, 2010 at 11:05 AM

holdonhere
Tennessee
Republicans are stupid creatures. They think they can go around doing what ever, when ever, where ever. You can't. There are rules. These rules are known, except to republicans. Why is that, why don't you people know the rules. These arn't new rules. It's as if we have to constantly update the republicans on the rules that all otheres know about. Why? Is it stupidity?
Tuesday, August 10, 2010 at 11:04 AM

dwatkins

NUTS!
Tuesday, August 10, 2010 at 11:04 AM

teabagparanoia
Ohio
The group these kids belong to is a front for the uber Right Wing. This group is so Right Wing it is a wonder the kids were not singing Deutschland uber alles.
Tuesday, August 10, 2010 at 11:04 AM

maryinohio
Ohio
Exactly what neutrality law is this and when was it passed? I wonder whether the students were allowed to recite the Gettysburg Address?
Tuesday, August 10, 2010 at 11:03 AM

archkid

I am completely dumbfounded how illiterate, ignorant, or just plain stupid most of you are. You fail to accept the fact that the Park Police were just doing there job enforcing a law that was made for a reason and that the children could have finished singing their national anthem if they had just moved 25 feet away from where they started singing. No one stopped them from singing the national anthem per say, they were merely stopped from singing it in the location they were in and as stated in article and above in this comment, they could have finished their song if they moved. Frankly I have a feeling the kids and their handlers caused a huge unnecessary rucus and would not listen to the. TRUTH they were being told. By the way our anthem needs to not be a militaristic ode to war, it needs to be changed to America The Beautiful.
Tuesday, August 10, 2010 at 11:02 AM

fritz59

THE NATIONAL ANTHEM SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO BE SUNG, RECITED, PREACHED, SIGNED, ETC. ON ANY SOVEREIGN TERRORITORY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WITHOUT CAUSE OR CIRCUMSTANCE OF THOSE SINGING, RECITING, ETC., OR THEIR POLITICAL, RELIGIOUS OR ANY OTHER BELIEFS!!!!! THIS IS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THIS IS OUR SONG!!!!! PERIOD!!!!!
 
see America was founded on the power of song, and this treater in office want's to take that power away from WE THE PEOPLE
 
the-isley-brothers-ballad-for-the-fallen-soldier.jpg


always!!!
 
One Brow said:
What is a sloanfeld infidel? I have a feeling I am one. Are you telling me to submit to myself?

I asm very glad Obama, as opposed to McCain, has been President these last two years. McCain would never have been willing to approve the stimulus, and without that I see unemployment as being much worse than it is now.
Click to expand...

Laughable.
 
I, for one, can understand why these brave youth are outraged. I have been a victim of this exact type of heinous infringement of my rights as a God fearing American. I was arrested for singing "America, the Beautiful" by some obviously liberal, socialist police officers in San Diego, CA. They should have been singing with me! What has this country come to when a man can't walk down the sidewalk, piss drunk, singing a patriotic song to a cop in a very sarcastic manner.... oh.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UB
One Brow said:
What is a sloanfeld infidel? I have a feeling I am one. Are you telling me to submit to myself?

I asm very glad Obama, as opposed to McCain, has been President these last two years. McCain would never have been willing to approve the stimulus, and without that I see unemployment as being much worse than it is now.
Click to expand...

McCain was/is more like Obama than either party would like to admit. The differences between them as seen in their debates was nothing more than saying the same thing in a different way. That's why I didn't vote for either.

I suspect that if McCain were elected there would not be much right now that would be any different except for maybe a different SC appointee. That said, some of the most liberal SC justices currently serving were put there by GOP presidents.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Top