Cappy_Smurf
Well-Known Member
Sample size. Silly of you to decide a 19 year old who took all of 27 3s will not be able to develop that part of his game. Even if he were 0-27, it would tell us very little about his future as a shooter.
So what's sillier, calling him a stretch four when he obviously can't shoot as of now, or being skeptical about him as a shooter? I never said anything about him not being able to develop that part of his game. What's silly is assuming that he will become a stretch 4, just because his form looks good, when so far, he can't hit the broad side of a barn.
.
My comments were addressing the assertion that he's the perfect fit as a stretch 4. As of now, that just simply isn't true.