In what ways? (Best administration) I’m being sincere when asking this. Just curious about your opinion.
Some more stuff:
What We’ve Learned About Biden, Part 1
As a candidate, Biden embraced a sweeping, potentially historic agenda on domestic policy, a plan that included once-in-a-generation infrastructure efforts, a wholesale reimagining of child and elder care and transformational investments in clean energy. But Democratic candidates for president almost always talk big.
As a senator and then as vice president, Biden had focused much more on the judiciary and foreign policy. It was easy to assume he wasn’t fully committed to his campaign agenda, or that he wouldn’t actually try to pursue it.
Boy, was that assumption wrong.
Biden
pushed forward with the big ideas, initially attempting to wrap them into one giant legislative package he called “
Build Back Better.” He deferred heavily to Democratic leaders in Congress and was not afraid to pass legislation on party-line votes, though he simultaneously pursued bipartisan legislation where he saw an opportunity.
Not every decision worked out. There’s a strong case that
narrowing the agenda even a little bit might have achieved more, or at least moved the process along more quickly.
But while Biden had to jettison some parts of the agenda and scale back others, he ended up achieving more than any reasonable analyst could have expected, affixing his signature to major initiatives that are now pouring hundreds of billions of dollars into
infrastructure,
semiconductor development and
cleanenergy ― and bringing down
prescriptiondrugprices, too.
What We’ve Learned About Biden, Part 2
On foreign policy, the most revealing episodes of Biden’s presidency have arguably been the withdrawal of American forces from Afghanistan and his position on the wars in Ukraine and Gaza. They represent very different challenges, though it’s possible to see some patterns in Biden’s approach.
One constant has been his attention to and management of international alliances. With Ukraine, he has managed to lead a policy response that’s been relatively free of dissent from America’s top international allies. In Gaza, he has maintained a united diplomatic front with Saudi Arabia and other regional players that, he hopes, will be the foundation of a post-war reconstruction and peace arrangement (as reported weeks ago by HuffPost’s
Akbar Shahid Ahmed).
The other constant is a firm conviction about right and wrong and what needs to be done, regardless of what Biden is hearing from critics, even in his own administration. It was obvious with the withdrawal from Afghanistan, which so many members of his
military and diplomatic establishment resisted or tried to slow down. It is even more obvious now with his support for Israel, despite a
growing outcry over what Israel’s response to the Oct. 7 attack by Hamas has meant for the
people of Gaza.
In both cases, it seems clear Biden is following his own inner compass. In Afghanistan, that compass points him toward getting American soldiers out of what he believed was a hopeless endeavor ― a perspective likely informed by having
a son who served in the military.
In the Middle East, the compass points him toward supporting an Israel he views primarily as an embattled refuge for the Jewish people. That view is a lot more common among older officials who formed their opinions in the era of
Golda Meir and the
Yom Kippur War, while the
Holocaust was a fresher memory and Israel was
repeatedlybattling Arab military forces.