So just throwing money at an issue will solve it? Just like throwing money at student loans will solve the issue. It’s a limited bandaid solution.
This is spoken like someone who has never owned a business or managed a large organization. This might fly with low info conservatives and Facebook friends, but not with thinking adults. Of course "throwing more money" will solve it. It's amazing how often "throwing money" at a problem is a large part of the solution if not thee largest part of the solution.
There are 2 issues here that you seem to be conflating:
1. Immigration
2. Asylum Seekers
1. If you want to "solve" illegal immigration then you'll need to "throw more money" at the issue. Hiring government workers to process visas and worker applications will require money. Increased border security will require money. If you want to invest into Central and South America to discourage migration here, that will require money.
2. If you want to mitigate the problem of asylum seekers crowding the border, that will require money. We need far more judges to hear cases. You can't ask asylum seekers to sit waiting for 8+ months to hear their cases.
3. Even if you want to cut off most immigration and asylum seeking, it will require money. Buying off private landowners, Land mines, rocket launchers, Berlin Wall like fencing, and alligators with lasers on their foreheads will all require money.
Legit? Is this subjective by each judge? So if the right is in power and sends right wing judges in so they can shut everyone out and if the left is in power they can send more liberal judges to let more people in? This is what is happening right now. Biden has let in more immigrants than the last 2 administrations combined.
This is weird flex. It seems like you're admitting that right wing judges can't judge cases based on merit and the law and instead will let their xenophobia take over. How else should asylum seekers have their cases decided? I guess you could have a committee of judges hear their cases and decide. That'll require, you know, throwing more "money at the issue."
Where? As I have posted before, we have no low income housing in America.
I know this might blow the minds of people who have never traveled to another country or like reading nonfiction books about other countries, but there are solutions to this.
How many are allowed in? How fast?
I'm uncomfortable with quotas. Those familiar with the Immigration Act of 1924 will probably understand why. Again, some non-fiction reading might be required.
Again the issue is not race. It’s resources. These blue cities are realizing it pretty quickly with just thousands of migrants getting dropped off there.
Asylum seekers or undocumented immigrants? There's a difference.
There's a huge difference between cities and states working together to help new arrivals succeed vs trying to score political pts with Fox News Viewers by promising migrants jobs and shipping them to a Vice President's house.
Trump says everyday “poisoning the nations blood”? Everyday?
Yes, this has become one of his talking pts over the past two months at rallies.
You, media and most of the left calling it racist to be against the flood of immigrants coming over the border Every Day, isn’t helping.
Grow up. Stop blaiming the media for reporting the words that the guy you'll most likely vote for this November says. Don't do that.
Is this racist or not? This is a yes or no question and much on whether this conversation with you continues hinges on how you answer this next question. You've whined before about being unfairly labeled a troll or accused of acting in bad faith. So here's your chance to prove ol Thriller wrong.
Is this racist, yes or no?
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKPFjAhd3KQ
