What's new
By:

Trade Confirmed: Jazz get jack for Bogey

infection said:
The great thing about trades like this is that everyone can point to how that was the market, how there definitely weren’t any better deals out there because of there were, we definitely would have done it. There needs to be a name for this phenomenon of assuming that we always got the best deal.
Click to expand...
It's called denial or self-delusion.
 
I seriously would love to know the reasoning behind a deal like this besides saving money. That is literally the only possible answer that makes any semblance of sense.

This is the same exact type of deal we did with Ingles.
 
Elizah Huge said:
I seriously would love to know the reasoning behind a deal like this besides saving money. That is literally the only possible answer that makes any semblance of sense.

This is the same exact type of deal we did with Ingles.
Click to expand...

Yeah, but at least Ingles was ded.
 
Elizah Huge said:
I seriously would love to know the reasoning behind a deal like this besides saving money. That is literally the only possible answer that makes any semblance of sense.

This is the same exact type of deal we did with Ingles.
Click to expand...
Except Ingles was looking terrible and then had a major injury while Bojan has been the secondary scorer on the “OMG historic offense” teams and is one of the most efficient guys in the league on an expiring deal.
 
Jazzmix said:
Yeah, but at least Ingles was ded.
Click to expand...

infection said:
Except Ingles was looking terrible and then had a major injury while Bojan has been the secondary scorer on the “OMG historic offense” teams and is one of the most efficient guys in the league on an expiring deal.
Click to expand...

That’s the point. We got the same return for an efficient scorer who averaged 18.4 PPG in his three years with us as a player who is worse and tore his ACL.
 
How can someone be so ****ing good at big trades literally the best to ever do it and simultaneously be so ****ing terrible at smaller trades?
 
The Fresh Prince said:
How is one below par trade " flushing it"? Lol just a week ago everyone was on board with the trades.
Click to expand...
So that means everyone must be on board with every trade regardless of outcome? Weird logic. Believe it or not, every trade is its own individual occurrence and everyone can react to each one differently. Crazy, right? One trade can be perceived as really good and the next one can be perceived as really bad, we don't have to have a single opinion that defines our response to every trade exactly as it did for the first one. I know that sounds crazy but it's true!
 
LogGrad98 said:
So that means everyone must be on board with every trade regardless of outcome? Weird logic. Believe it or not, every trade is its own individual occurrence and everyone can react to each one differently. Crazy, right? One trade can be perceived as really good and the next one can be perceived as really bad, we don't have to have a single opinion that defines our response to every trade exactly as it did for the first one. I know that sounds crazy but it's true!
Click to expand...
You're making it seem like one trade kills the entire offseason.
 
The Fresh Prince said:
You're making it seem like one trade kills the entire offseason.
Click to expand...
No one said that. I just said that every trade is viewed as its own thing, how is that even implying that one trade makes another trade worse?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top