Thee Idiotic Minivan K
Well-Known Member
What about Harris for Matthews it would allow us to not have to trade Millsap. I'm guessing other players would need to be involved. What do you guys say.
Trade idea
- Thread starter Thee Idiotic Minivan K
- Start date
Darkwing Duck
Well-Known Member
I don't see the point to this. Be on guard for people who will troll you. It should be the Price you pay for making this thread.
Great idea if you can get either Irving or Knight in the draft..
This is one of the most amazing things I've ever seen. At least since Double Rainbow.
Thee Idiotic Minivan K
Well-Known Member
That was my thought. I just didn't post that part. I thought I read somewhere that Miller isn't getting along with his coach. There's a chance they might be willing to trade for a Pg. that can get along with the coach, also maby we could get Miller out of it. Does Fernandez still want out of Portland? If so would Portland do this....
Jazz give up Harris, memo's expiring contract
Portland gives up Matthews and Miller who isn't happy in Portland
If I were in Portland's camp I probably wouldn't do that. The Jazz would probably have to throw in a future pick, but you never know.
Chad Feldheimer
Well-Known Member
No pick for Matthews. If we did trade Harris we could get a pick or picks for him! Lets just draft us a sg for the future with 1 of our 4 loto picks in the next 2 years. That might be the best Idea. Hayward>Matthews, Barns/Jones/Hamilton (potential)>Matthews. Plus Matthews is maybe 6ft 4. I hope Utah builds a hugh team Knight/Harris, Hayward/Miles, Ak/Jones/Evans, Favors/Millsap, Jefferson/Fez/Tomic. Straight up, that team would have some advantages right from the tip off!
I like this trade a lot actually, but there not going to give up Batum, if they wouldn't even trade him in a package for Melo.
Darkwing Duck
Well-Known Member
I still don't see why you'd want to trade the only point guard on the roster next year for a slightly upgraded C.J. Miles.
Thee Idiotic Minivan K
Well-Known Member
The point of my trade idea was that we get to keep Millsap. He makes us even deeper, and is someone we need to be a contender in the next couple years.
If we do draft knight, he might not be ready to start at pg it would've nice to have Miller to handle the start, and mentor the rook.
If we do draft knight, he might not be ready to start at pg it would've nice to have Miller to handle the start, and mentor the rook.
Please start a new thread and defend this view like your life depends on it.
"Hi, my name is Dwayne, and I'm only six foot four."
Ha ha and I think that when Miles get a solid 34 minutes a game, he will be more productive then Matthews.
Hayward > Matthews
Younger >
Potential >
Athletic >
ft <
stats per 40 >
Current Jazz man >
Cheaper >
Taller >
Plays sg/sf best >
Steals <
Blocks >
Play maker >
shooter = Haywards shot has come on strong, I want him to shoot the 3 ball and take more shots now!
But, I like what Matthews did for the Jazz Last year and he was fun to watch. But, Im just saying, that I'm more excited to see what Hayward brings to our team in the next year or 2 then what Matthews would bring. Plus, we have 4 super lotto picks to get us a better sg/sf them Matthews, that will be cheaper for the next 4 years
Younger >
Potential >
Athletic >
ft <
stats per 40 >
Current Jazz man >
Cheaper >
Taller >
Plays sg/sf best >
Steals <
Blocks >
Play maker >
shooter = Haywards shot has come on strong, I want him to shoot the 3 ball and take more shots now!
But, I like what Matthews did for the Jazz Last year and he was fun to watch. But, Im just saying, that I'm more excited to see what Hayward brings to our team in the next year or 2 then what Matthews would bring. Plus, we have 4 super lotto picks to get us a better sg/sf them Matthews, that will be cheaper for the next 4 years