What's new
By:

Trade Rumors Involving the Jazz

Elizah Huge said:
I’ll even take it if it’s top-4 protected or something.
Click to expand...
If they have even minimal protection on the 2027 pick then doesn’t that keep them from trading the 2029 or later picks in any other trade until the pick transfers? I doubt they want that limitation from future moves.
 
Lakers rotation after that trade:

PG - Mike Conley / Dennis Schroder / Patrick Beverly
SG - Malik Beasley / Austin Reeves
SF - LeBron James / Lonnie Walker
PF - Jarred Vanderbilt / Rui Hachimura
C - Anthony Davis / Thomas Bryant
 
default said:
Improves our chances for a higher lottery pick. Gives us a desirable unprotected first round pick. Gives us lots of cap space this summer. But we’d be less fun to watch for a few month. I’d lean yes, but hope we can get just a little more like a swap or a couple second rounders
Click to expand...
Swap the 23 Lakers/spells pick for the Nets/76ers pick and try to add Rudy Gay. That deal is absolute gold.
 
Get this… if the Lakers added Gabriel to that trade they’d save 6.3M which would put them in a lower tax bracket. They’d not only save 6.3M in salary but a whopping 16M on their luxury tax payment.
 
hgb said:
No way I give them Beasley, Vando _and_ Conley if they want protections on those picks.
Click to expand...
Exactly- I think they've got to take on some crap salary like Gay as well and I still don't think its a good enough deal for Ainge. I'm not sure what good a bunch of salary cap space is for the Jazz.
 
default said:
If they have even minimal protection on the 2027 pick then doesn’t that keep them from trading the 2029 or later picks in any other trade until the pick transfers? I doubt they want that limitation from future moves.
Click to expand...

They could have it convey as unprotected in 2028 which would allow them to trade their 2030 pick along with a 2029 pick swap if they wanted to this summer.
 
Elizah Huge said:
Get this… if the Lakers added Gabriel to that trade they’d save 6.3M which would put them in a lower tax bracket. They’d not only save 6.3M in salary but a whopping 16M on their luxury tax payment.
Click to expand...
Jazz would have to cut a deal somewhere else to keep themselves from going over the tax line. It’s not worth becoming a taxpayer this year. . . much rather keep flexibility than help the Lakers owners save cash.
 
LoPo said:
The Lakers lack depth and selflessness. Conley is a total team guy. Vanderbilt is the ultimate selfless guy. Beasley is a shooter for a team that desperately needs to spread the floor for LBJ and AD.

If the Lakers only give up one protected pick (maybe protected for only #1 or something), they would be idiots. I don't see a better value trade to help them right now.
Click to expand...
Not only that... Beasley has an option... so if the summer brings options you can waive him. You can move Conley next year to pursue Kyrie or waive his partially guaranteed deal if he gets hurt... Vando is cheap so all three guys have optionality too.

They should have done the deal this summer with Bogey... but this is still good and could be great if Mike stays healthy.

they also need to realize their BS has pissed off enough teams that some teams are now penalizing them. Openly talking about every teams players and recruiting them through nefarious means limits how many friends they have out there.
 
Coach Ellis said:
Jazz would have to cut a deal somewhere else to keep themselves from going over the tax line. It’s not worth becoming a taxpayer this year. . . much rather keep flexibility than help the Lakers owners save cash.
Click to expand...
I thought we had $7 million in space?

Westbrook for Conley, Beasley and Vanderbilt brings in less than $5 million extra. Even with a couple minimum pickups, we would avoid the luxury without having to do an extra deal right?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top