What's new
By:

UnitedHealth care plans to keep much of Obama's health care regardless of Supreme court ruling

You make me smile KOC.

Edit: Also isn't the court case mainly about the personal mandate?
 
As long as they have no intent to make money, don't care about making money, don't care about success then I deem them not evil.

Otherwise, wanting to feed your own kids more than other people's kids is the root of all evil.
 
Yes, the federal case is about the mandate but if you take away the mandate than much of the new benefits are no longer economically feasible for companies. If you read the article you will see that they are keeping things like keeping wellness checkups free, allowing you to keep your kids on parents insurance until 26, no longer having lifetime limits on how much they will pay, and they will not stop coverage for preexisting conditions anymore. PROPS TO THEM!
 
Gameface said:
As long as they have no intent to make money, don't care about making money, don't care about success then I deem them not evil.

Otherwise, wanting to feed your own kids more than other people's kids is the root of all evil.
Click to expand...

What about wanting to give your kids yachts while other kids die of untreated illnesses? That one is little bit more murky.
 
KOC BEGONE said:
Yes, the federal case is about the mandate but if you take away the mandate than much of the new benefits are no longer economically feasible for companies. If you read the article you will see that they are keeping things like keeping wellness checkups free, allowing you to keep your kids on parents insurance until 26, no longer having lifetime limits on how much they will pay, and they will not stop coverage for preexisting conditions anymore. PROPS TO THEM!
Click to expand...

So basically a company is making business decisions that they think is best for them and their clients? Great! That is the way it is supposed to work.

This painting of conservatives as against the health bill in its entirety is idiocy. Clearly they are against items such as the personal mandate and birth control/contraception issues but they are not agaisnt everything in it.
 
Cyrone Torbin said:
What about wanting to give your kids yachts while other kids die of untreated illnesses? That one is little bit more murky.
Click to expand...

Maybe you'll be the first one to explain to me the origin of one's non-voluntary obligation to others. I ask the question in all seriousness and have never gotten even an attempt at an answer.

Sad truth, people die and suffer every day. We don't all need to force ourselves to suffer until no one is suffering anymore. That is a much more monstrous world than the one we currently live in.
 
Stoked said:
So basically a company is making business decisions that they think is best for them and their clients? Great! That is the way it is supposed to work.

This painting of conservatives as against the health bill in its entirety is idiocy. Clearly they are against items such as the personal mandate and birth control/contraception issues but they are not agaisnt everything in it.
Click to expand...

Weren't conservatives for this in the 90s? Actually, weren't they the ones that came up with this in the 90s?

It was meant as a price control against folks who irresponsibility rolled without insurance only to become sick and then stressing the system more since they had no way of paying for their treatments.
 
The Thriller said:
Weren't conservatives for this in the 90s? Actually, weren't they the ones that came up with this in the 90s?

It was meant as a price control against folks who irresponsibility rolled without insurance only to become sick and then stressing the system more since they had no way of paying for their treatments.
Click to expand...

I am not sure. Would not suprise me at all as politicians are almost all snakeoil salesmen/women.
 
Gameface said:
Maybe you'll be the first one to explain to me the origin of one's non-voluntary obligation to others. I ask the question in all seriousness and have never gotten even an attempt at an answer.

Sad truth, people die and suffer every day. We don't all need to force ourselves to suffer until no one is suffering anymore. That is a much more monstrous world than the one we currently live in.
Click to expand...

Wasn't saying they don't have the right to do so, just saying your comment made it look like it was the difference between them putting food on the table or not.
 
Cyrone Torbin said:
Wasn't saying they don't have the right to do so, just saying your comment made it look like it was the difference between them putting food on the table or not.
Click to expand...

For some people it may very well be the difference. For others, such as Obama and Romney, it obviously is not.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top