1 her coach was coaching from the stands. He admitted he was coaching. While not always enforced, it's always illegal. No problem with this warning.
2. Breaking her racket. Clear code violation. This is regularly enforced. Point penalty because it's the second violation. Again no problem with this ruling.
3. Abuse of the umpire. This one is not as clear. She did go on about it. Calling him a thief a couple of times. He enforced the code violation. Since it was the third violation, it resulted in the game penalty.
Umpire could have warned her to stop the rant, or he would enforce the penalty. She was clearly worked up and emotional, and the humane thing to do would have been to tell her before taking the game penalty. But he didn't. He was within his rights to do so, and he was consistent within the match.
Her complaint is that the men get away with worse. It is so inconsistent that I'm sure some do. Especially the big names are rarely called on the carpet so quickly. So maybe there problem isn't sexism, but elitism. In this case her expectation to be treated like a big name/ man.
When she found that this umpire would not bend the rules for her, she justified it as he was sexist. That is not justified unless this judge had taken similar abuse from a Male tennis player and consistently not enforced the rule. She would have known that he was not lenient, if she could have controlled her temper and thought about it. Instead she practically dared him to enforce it by going on the extended rant.
She did show class by calling on the crowd to stop booing and cheer Osaka.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using
JazzFanz mobile app