I don't even want to get into the debate between the two, been enough of that. But viewing this from the FO/team perspective...one guy is considered a considered a "good" contract at 4/$72 so how can the guy who is beat him out be such a bad deal at 4/$60? You can agree/disagree with Hardy's evaluation of the two, but it's safe to say they're extremely close in the pecking order. Contracts have more considerations than this, Sexton has a longer track record for example, but I don't think that changes the fact that he is a very reasonable reference point. But at the end of the day if the Jazz believe in THT to the extent that they believe in Sexton I don't see why they wouldn't be open to that type of contract.