Because Jerebko is a good locker room presence, and would add to their chemistry. Make it happen.Pretty sure the wolves would do a Jerebko for KAT straight up, because of salary cap or something. Reasons!
I’m not paying Wiggins 30M a year based on potential, potential that really isn’t even there imo. That’s dumb as **** and a guaranteed way to completely hamstring our organization for a few years, thus wasting the rest of Ingles’ prime and three key years this team has in what is a very small window in our best chance to win a title since the John and Karl days. It’ll be AK all over again.
I agree that is too much to pay for just potential. But he has shown he can play and play well. He just needs to be more efficient and better on defense. He had a season already that is almost identical statistically to what Mitchell just did this year. 23.6 ppg is more than just potential, he also shot better from the field and 3 than Mitchell that year. He did regress this year though.
Also teams can handle 1 bad contract, but it would be a risk. That is why I would not give up anything for him of value, only if they are dumping him.
I don't think Wiggins is a lost cause. I think he needs to be moved and it needs to be the right situation.
I know people are going to think I'm nuts, but if the price is, say, a 1st and expirings, I would seriously examine it.
Let's remember what organization he's coming from for a moment. One not known for excellence, cultivating it, or demanding it. That is, until they suddenly hire a coach not known for much besides asking too much of his main guys and not always the best communicator.
I agree that is too much to pay for just potential. But he has shown he can play and play well. He just needs to be more efficient and better on defense. He had a season already that is almost identical statistically to what Mitchell just did this year. 23.6 ppg is more than just potential, he also shot better from the field and 3 than Mitchell that year. He did regress this year though.
Also teams can handle 1 bad contract, but it would be a risk. That is why I would not give up anything for him of value, only if they are dumping him.
I agree that is too much to pay for just potential. But he has shown he can play and play well. He just needs to be more efficient and better on defense. He had a season already that is almost identical statistically to what Mitchell just did this year. 23.6 ppg is more than just potential, he also shot better from the field and 3 than Mitchell that year. He did regress this year though.
Also teams can handle 1 bad contract, but it would be a risk. That is why I would not give up anything for him of value, only if they are dumping him.
Yes, they are different players in very different points in they careers.Wait aren’t you the guy who doesn’t want Rudy Gay on a MLE type deal? But u want Wiggins on a 5 year max?
I’m 100% out on Andrew Wiggins.
I agree that is too much to pay for just potential. But he has shown he can play and play well. He just needs to be more efficient and better on defense. He had a season already that is almost identical statistically to what Mitchell just did this year. 23.6 ppg is more than just potential, he also shot better from the field and 3 than Mitchell that year. He did regress this year though.
Also teams can handle 1 bad contract, but it would be a risk. That is why I would not give up anything for him of value, only if they are dumping him.
I've watched him plenty. There are lots of things I don't like. I think those things are fixable and he still can become a really good player. But it's certainly not without risk. But he is young and has loads of talent. It would be a high risk high reward trade which isn't always the best. There are other trades I would prefer. That's why I wouldn't take him unless it's a salary dump. I wouldn't give up assets and take on his contract. I don't think Minny would go for that yet.I think you need to watch some Andrew Wiggins basketball. Think about all the times you get pissed off when Alec dribbles around for 5 seconds and takes a long two. Times that by 20 and triple Burks pay.
So... if you could have a 22 Years old Wiggins with his dreamy length and athleticism plus that $150 million dollar 5 year contract and that "work ethic"
OR
You could have a 23 year old Jabari with that 'quintessential stretch four/bruising three' body with those KNEES and say $18 - $22 million 4 year contract (lower due to risk of injury)
OR
You could have a 22 year old virgin Exum with that Harden stopping defense and that slashing guard plus those 3 MAJOR injuries at $8 million/year (lower due to risk of injury)
Who do you take?
I don't see that happening. I don't think there's any way the Spurs will trade Kawai to the Lakers and help them create a superteam.