framer
Well-Known Member
Than what New York was offering? Cleveland, Orlando, Washington, Toronto, and maybe Miami. These were all known at the time.Who are those teams with better packages than New York?
Than what New York was offering? Cleveland, Orlando, Washington, Toronto, and maybe Miami. These were all known at the time.Who are those teams with better packages than New York?
The Knicks are still whining saying Ainge didn't give them a fair shake. WTF?Than what New York was offering? Cleveland, Orlando, Washington, Toronto, and maybe Miami. These were all known at the time.
The hell with them...The Knicks are still whining saying Ainge didn't give them a fair shake. WTF?
Haha I love it. More whine with that cheese!!The Knicks are still whining saying Ainge didn't give them a fair shake. WTF?
Umm, no. Who are the teams that are going to offer better packages to the Lakers for Westbrook? Only a tanking team with veteran assets will be willing take on that massive contract. The Jazz have more veteran pieces that the Lakers would want than anyone else, except maybe the Pacers. I don't think the Pacers are going full blown tank.Who are those teams with better packages than New York?
Russillo and Simmons weighed in on this deal. Both were puzzled and certain that the last Knicks offer was better. Cuuuz... it... was...
That blood must've been pretty bad.
Of the players dealt away, Markkanen will be most difficult to replace. No matter what anyone thought of Cleveland’s tall-ball experiment and whether Markkanen was viewed as an actual long-term solution at small forward, he was their best option, helping create a unique -- and successful -- frontcourt. Having Markkanen flanked by Mobley and Allen, Cleveland boasted three nimble, versatile, switchable and skilled 7-footers. With them on the court together, the Cavs had an offensive rating of 109.9 and a stingy 102.0 rating at the other end. They outscored opponents by 7.9 points per 100 possessions. Markkanen also brought a needed element on offense -- shooting and floor-spacing.
If they get "bubble" Don, they scored big. If they get Don post-bubble, they still get a player better than Sexton, but definitely not worth the trade capital paid.I don’t think it was better. They are high on RJ and think the Knicks picks are going to be better than the Cavs picks because they literally act like Evan Mobley is Tim Duncan 2.0.
The players we got back from the Cavs are being slept on. The Cavs were 7-4 with Sexton last year.
Here is what their best beat writer Chris Fedor said about Markannen:
After the initial excitement of the Donovan deal I have seen a lot of Cavs fans saying they overpaid a ton for a player who might not be that much better than Sexton.
OMG JUST STOP TALKING!!!Mitchell has always reminded me of an ever so slightly better CJ McCollum.
Statically they basically are the same. CJ takes less shots so less points but besides that they are extremely close.OMG JUST STOP TALKING!!!
NoStatically they basically are the same. CJ takes less shots so less points but besides that they are extremely close.
As far as intangibles and how they score they are very different players. Plus, who would you want in the playoffs when things really matter? Statistically or otherwise.Statically they basically are the same. CJ takes less shots so less points but besides that they are extremely close.
Mitchell and Curry stats were pretty similar, but it ain’t close. LmaoStatically they basically are the same. CJ takes less shots so less points but besides that they are extremely close.
Russillo and Simmons weighed in on this deal. Both were puzzled and certain that the last Knicks offer was better. Cuuuz... it... was...
That blood must've been pretty bad.
Curry scored 34 per in the finals. Mitchell got his *** kicked by Brunson and lost to Dallas. C'mon bro.Mitchell and Curry stats were pretty similar, but it ain’t close. Lmao