What's new

Worst Move? Drafting Hayward over George or Burks over Leonard?

D Will Texas

Well-Known Member
Watching these playoffs got me thinking....

Imagine these true "studs" as our starting wings. George is athletic enough to handle SG duties.

Our Core 4 would have true Championship potential, as it stands now , we'll need Favors and Kanter to be absolutely unstoppable to even sniff the Finals
 
No brainer for me - we should have taken Leonard. I was pumped at the time that he was still on the board and surprised that we passed on him. To think that Jimmer went higher than Leonard is amazing
 
I always struggle saying that we should have taken a player that does well in the Spurs system because well...players are always doing well in the Spurs system. You also have to consider how those players would do playing for us. Both of their numbers would most likely decrease due to coaching. With that said, I would have taken Leonard so that we could play him at 3 and Hayward at the 2 spot.
 
I always struggle saying that we should have taken a player that does well in the Spurs system because well...players are always doing well in the Spurs system. You also have to consider how those players would do playing for us. Both of their numbers would most likely decrease due to coaching. With that said, I would have taken Leonard so that we could play him at 3 and Hayward at the 2 spot.

This, you have to wonder if a lot of Leonard's success is from Pop's system. If I could go back I'd rather have Leonard though and on draft day I thought the same thing.
 
No brainer for me - we should have taken Leonard. I was pumped at the time that he was still on the board and surprised that we passed on him. To think that Jimmer went higher than Leonard is amazing

I know its not like Jimmer crushed him in the ncaa tournament or anything :rolleyes:
 
easy buddy, its an interesting question to ponder....

dude it is like being at prom and wishing you were with some one else. why keep beating yourself.

I could play the same stupid game with my sons death. what if we had taken him to the hospital sooner. what if we had seen the signs sooner. what if the doctors had given him the meds sooner. and the list goes on. WE DID NOT DRAFT THEM MOVE ON.
 
Hayward is better than George, soon you shall see. Hayward is a very special player that has been under utilized, but his time is coming, and hopefully these ungrateful posts will cease. Don't get me wrong, George is great, will be a very good player, but I still think Hayward will be better. Hayward has been the kind of player that has sacrificed himself for the good of his team, the kind of **** that doesn't show up on stat sheets. Post injury, Hayward went on a rampage, and that was as the 4th, sometimes 5th option in the offense. A lot of his contributions don't show up on a stat sheet. He is the guy that helps to get our offense into position (when we didn't run Alfense), but didn't necessarily get the assist, he was the guy who made the pass before that allowed for the easy assist --the kind of IQ you can't teach.

I really think that if Hayward gets bumped up in the offense pecking order, and gets his minutes next year (which the F/O has indicated), a lot of people will be singing a different tune about him.

As for Burks, I love him, but I don't think, as of now (and this is Corbin and the F/O's fault for screwing up his development), is as good as Leonard. I think Burks has a different game though, and we've seen glimpses of greatness when he was getting consistent minutes when Mo was injured, but then we saw some desperate plays from him when he wasn't getting regular minutes. I don't want to judge his potential yet, because I don't think he, or Kevin Murphy, or Jeremy Evans, or Kanter, have been given anywhere near the kind of minutes necessary to develop their games.
 
You fools just wait until burks is unleashed and you will forget all about that ******* in san antonio
 
Back
Top