why not include minutes? Especially since he's playing behind two of the best perimeter players in the league..
Why do we assume it's going to be a wing? We have Hayward and Burks starting and pretty decent backups in Ingles, Hood and Millsap.
When DL talked about maybe speeding things up and also said Exum was a "placeholder" when he was in there, it got me thinking Lindsey could sure package the pick and Trey for a big upgrade at PG. Then have Exum come off the bench again. Or he still starts and plays 20 mins, but you have a very good PG come off the bench and play 28. Could be a pure PG or a combo guard. Would not surprise me one bit if that were to happen. And a player like Cotton or Neto could come aboard as the 3rd PG.
25, 28, and 29min this year... so he is getting plenty of play time. I know he is playing behind Klay and Steph, but it is still something to consider.
Not all that into Barnes tbh
Posted an offer on the GSW realGM board. Utah 2015+GSW2017 for Barnes. Lets see if they want any part of it...
Nice work.
We can also throw in 2 second rounders in '17 as well if they hesitate. That should seal the deal.
yeah, but you referenced Hayward's "jump."
Barnes has had steady minutes/steady production.
Hayward started with 17 minutes and had gone to 35+. I think that is a big enough jump in minutes differential to warrant a rebuttal.
Besides all that, we're talking about trading for a guy making $5.5MM ... not trading for Hayward.
And you think GS would be a willing partner? Dealing Barnes, who is a great fit, only saves them about $2M (based on our draft pick costing about $2M in rookie salary).You take the best deal/player you can find. You have to have a willing trade partners. Barnes is a pretty solid suggestion.
Nice work.
We can also throw in 2 second rounders in '17 as well if they hesitate. That should seal the deal.
And you think GS would be a willing partner? Dealing Barnes, who is a great fit, only saves them about $2M (based on our draft pick costing about $2M in rookie salary).
I'd be all for getting Barnes if it could be done. I'm just saying a wing is not necessarily the ONLY way to go. And, in fact, if DL is interested in "speeding things up," the logical step might just be to give the team a more experienced and better PG. Even IF Dante is our PGOTF (which I think he is), he's a couple years away from being a top-15 player at his position.
Barnes at close to a 2:1 A:TO ratio.. plus 43% from 3.
Done. Trade GSW our pick straight up so they can make space and bring on a new guy to prune.
And you think GS would be a willing partner? Dealing Barnes, who is a great fit, only saves them about $2M (based on our draft pick costing about $2M in rookie salary).
I'd be all for getting Barnes if it could be done. I'm just saying a wing is not necessarily the ONLY way to go. And, in fact, if DL is interested in "speeding things up," the logical step might just be to give the team a more experienced and better PG. Even IF Dante is our PGOTF (which I think he is), he's a couple years away from being a top-15 player at his position.